... They let Batista win the World Heavyweight Championship from Triple H?
2007-03-28 16:22:25 · 28 answers · asked by Triple H 5 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhh hell yes they did.
batista didn't deseve it.
and not to mention
they let bastista beat
HHH at 3 different ppv first backlash then vengace.
it made me sick
2007-03-28 16:29:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yes they made a big mistake. However they can fix there mistake at WM23 or they will have 2 more mistakes. Undertaker wins the belt from Batista. If they let Batista win and snap Takers WM winning streak. All h*ll will break lose. The Billionare's Hair match could help if Donald wins it and Vince has to be shaved bald. HHH will win the WWE title when he comes back.
2007-03-28 16:44:56 · answer #2 · answered by uoptiger_79 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It wasn't a big mistake, but It would have been better is HHH won at WM 21.
I think it should be Batista vs Cena this year. That would suck if Taker loses his streak to Batista, but I also can't imagine Taker wining the title again cause Batista has his youth and makes more sense for him to win.
2007-03-28 16:40:30 · answer #3 · answered by timmytude 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no. they let HHH have 10 World Heavyweight Championship reigns. the fans were tired of him and they needed him to join dx or feud with john cena so that they would cheer him again. batista got his 15 minutes of fame by winning the championship. however, batista's 15 minutes are up and its time to drop his title to the undertaker.
2007-03-28 22:03:21 · answer #4 · answered by shawn michaels pwns cena 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Personally...no they didn't...at the time alot of people were on HHH for being a title hog and such...and Batista was really the only person on the RAW brand at the time with a storyline and crowd reaction suitable to take the belt away from HHH...so no they didn't mess up with his first title reign...it made perfect sense...but they did mess up with his second title reign...he just lost something and he has gotten bland...
2007-03-28 16:41:58 · answer #5 · answered by outsider8402 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no.batista was way over with the crowd and everyone wanted batista to win the championship including batista
2007-03-28 18:57:09 · answer #6 · answered by yudi 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think they did what they could to get a big man over on Smackdown. Batista is not exactly a young guy so if they were gonna push him they had to go ahead and do it.
2007-03-28 16:34:41 · answer #7 · answered by Jayson Kane 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Batista is the beast, i would have liked to see a match between Brock Lesner and Dave Batista. THAT WOULD BE A GREAT MATCH. Another one would be Stone Cold Vs. Goldberg.
2007-03-28 17:00:45 · answer #8 · answered by king james 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
TripleH, he had to leave ,and he had to lose the belts, to be with his wife Stephenie , who just had a baby. HHH will be back after everythings settles down. The family come first, he doesn,t need Wrestling moneys, he,s richs and famous.1.TV Commercails,2.movies3.Magazines/Books4.TOYS/GAMES5.LISTS GOES ON. Triple H you be back stronger and the best game ever, never know DX might show up for WRESTLEMANIA 23.
2007-03-28 16:52:45 · answer #9 · answered by riccibigm47 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nah,triple h held the title for so long that it made me sick! (even though i liked him).
Batista,well,he deserved it in my opinion cuz winning the royal rumble is 1 of the hardest things to do in wrestling so he did deserve it.
Im not saying this cuz im a fan of him,and to all his haters who just said that he didnt deserve it jus' because u dont like him,u make me sick!
2007-03-28 17:20:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No. Hell, I don't think it would have been a mistake in the least if they had let RVD win it from him the last time they had a match aginst one another. If you want to say "one another." If anyone was not sick of Hunter holding the title at that time then I don't know what the hell could've been wrong with them. That guy made me hate wrestling for quite some time.
2007-03-28 16:31:08 · answer #11 · answered by wtf*ftw 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋