English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

In Dec. 1999 Wen Ho Lee was charged with improper handling of restricted data, to which he pleaded guilty as part of a plea bargain.

Did you know that last year On June 3, 2006, the U.S. federal government and five media organizations (the Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times, the New York Times, ABC News, and the Associated Press) announced they would jointly pay Lee a total of $1.6 million to settle allegations that government leaks violated his privacy.

Are you kidding me? Wen Ho Lee pleaded GUILTY to one felony count of improperly downloading Restricted Data. In return, the government released him from jail and dropped the other 58 counts of illegally downloading classified data from the computers at the Los Alamos weapons lab, of which 39 counts would have carried a life sentence for violating the Atomic Energy Act and for stealing nuclear secrets with the intent of harming the U.S. He should be serving a life sentence and instead we just made him a millionaire.

2007-03-28 16:21:10 · 9 answers · asked by John Boy 4 in Politics & Government Politics

Here is the article in the Washington Post.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/02/AR2006060201060.html

2007-03-28 16:23:53 · update #1

Doesn't it sound like we actually rewarded him for spying for China and selling our nuclear secrets to them. Heck, I guess I'm in the wrong line of work? Looks like federal crimes and being a convicted felon is a great way to make a living now days.

2007-03-28 16:26:31 · update #2

ArgleBargleWoogleBoo - Which China Sparky? There is absolutely no evidence whatsoever he sold secrets to anyone. Nice Faux smear.

What part of "He plead GUILTY" did you not understand there?

2007-03-28 16:57:16 · update #3

9 answers

I pray that this is not true. If it is, it's just another example of how this "pc" country no longer has the slightest clue of how to keep itself safe. If the reverse had been true and a Chinese scientist was found at the minimum of "mishandling classified information", he/she would have never again seen the light of day. This is not to say that our great nation should lower ourselves to the level of red china and their abhorrent human rights record. But I will argue that if you have a cancer eating away at you from the inside, you must cut it out or risk death. China is easily the biggest long term threat this country faces...anti satellite tests, shadowing our carrier groups with submarines, grossly understating their defense budget. BE VERY WARY OF THE NEMESIS IN THE EAST!

2007-03-28 16:33:38 · answer #1 · answered by camhunt13 2 · 0 0

a million. the information leaked became already obtainable to the same old public 2. I cant have self assurance the dept who made the errors (holy dung... people artwork contained in the government and errors ensue!?) known because it "a sprint embarrassing"...um, its plenty embarrassing 3. i'm shocked returned and returned by utilising how many conservatives are constantly on Yahoo solutions, in simple terms gazing. I truly have morals yet i do no longer drink the H8R-help 4. You committed my grammar puppy peeve: its weren't the place. Cmon guy. 5. we are shield. A mistake befell. A bone headed one and that i'm beneficial heads have rolled. yet returned, examine #a million. It became public information anyhow. Take a chill out tablet people. possibly you will all start up feeling greater advantageous once you give up being so dang damaging. The consiperacy theory that our President leaked comfortable information is ludicris. i'm beneficial you all have greater important issues to freak out approximately...

2016-10-01 21:22:33 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Lesson learned. America no longer allows foreigners access to secrets. It does not matter that they become citizens. They don't have the same loyalty as Americans.

2007-03-28 16:37:55 · answer #3 · answered by a bush family member 7 · 0 0

Those secrets were sold to the Chinese back in 1997 for billions in campaign donations for Hillary's senate bid.

Remember? Bill Clinton was the man who sold the world.

2007-03-28 16:25:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous 7 · 3 1

Which China Sparky? There is absolutely no evidence whatsoever he sold secrets to anyone. Nice Faux smear.

2007-03-28 16:28:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

and Gonzalez is being thrown over the coal for what he did this is major stuff compared to what Gonzalez did

2007-03-28 16:29:04 · answer #6 · answered by gus1023 5 · 1 1

This is why we need to be tough on crime --- much tougher than we currently are.

2007-03-28 16:26:20 · answer #7 · answered by daddyspanksalot 5 · 3 0

thanks mr. william jefferson clinton and wife

2007-03-28 16:24:26 · answer #8 · answered by bluesharpman_642000 3 · 4 1

what... the... hell...

2007-03-28 16:24:12 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers