Cons who really "micromanaged the war?

Question

When a Democratic Congress attempts to rein in the mismanagement, excesses, and lack of cohesive policy the Bush administration has demonstrated in the war in Iraq I see a familar refrain running through the cons dialogue, (must have been on Rush's show or something) and it goes something like "politicians are trying to micromanage the war and tie the Generals hands." Well I have to ask hasn't this been happening to tragic effect already, some reminders:
General Shinseki estimates several hundred thousand troops need, advice unheeded
Gen. Anthony Zinni called for Rumsfeld's resignation.
Army Maj. Gen.Paul Eaton lambasted Rumsfeld as "incompetent strategically, operationally and tactically,"
Army Maj. Gen. Charles H. Swannack Jr., the commander of the 82nd Airborne Division believes the United States is losing, he said, "I think strategically, we are." The framers were politicians, Wolfowitz, Perle, Rumsfield, Cheney, Fukuyama, Feith, Hadley, Abrams, Wurmser, and of course BUSH!

LeAnne can you read ther is a question there but instead of addressing it with facts you spout partisab crap, gee thannks for reinforcing my thoughts about todays conservative movement

Answer 1

It's always the same with the right, do as we say not as we do, like we're a nation of children

Answer 2

I really don't see a question here, but I get your drift.

Fact is, the right has embraced a policy of victory in this war - and the left has clearly demonstrated a policy of defeat and surrender. Which policy do you truly think is in America's best interests?