English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I am not advocating the recall of all those in the house and senate who voted for the inclusion of a timetable, just those who sold their votes for special interest earmarks (pork). It seems to me illogical that if one believes placing a timetable restriction on troop funding is dangerous, then how does the insertion of an earmark in any way make it less dangerous? If we make the natural presumption that national security were outweighed by political favor, then it would seem to me that a recall based on at most; violation of oath of office or at minimum dereliction of duty would be in order. Since most states allow recall under these conditions, with the submition of petition containing the number of signatures equivalent to 25% of the votes cast in the previous election, do you think this should be pursued?

2007-03-28 15:34:05 · 7 answers · asked by Adam Smith 2 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

Jose- other than the requirement to submit reports to congress which should hardly be deemed an earmark, H.J.RES.114 which authorized the use of military force in Iraq contains NO language to support your claim

2007-03-28 16:25:37 · update #1

7 answers

yes, buying votes through earmarks should be banned and when you put your personal interests above national interests you should be tried in court- treason maybe

2007-03-28 15:37:49 · answer #1 · answered by Vickie P 1 · 3 0

Excellent question, the problem is how to prove anything. Just because something is obvious does not mean it can be proven and while people will judge their best friends based on the flimsiest of evidence they will withhold judgment on politicians and public figures until the media starts a barbecue.

2007-03-29 22:12:32 · answer #2 · answered by jshbrnd 2 · 0 0

It sure is strange how these honorable, as they wished to be called, representatives can sell the country over another bridge to nowhere.

Would like to see if my own congressman is on that list.

2007-03-28 22:48:19 · answer #3 · answered by Sgt 524 5 · 2 0

Adam Smi Best wishes for you...
http://208.109.69.157/funstuff/freeecard/greeting01.asp?Name=Adam-Smi

2007-03-28 22:51:32 · answer #4 · answered by fja h 1 · 0 0

of course it should be pursued...but im guessing it wont be...after all, the dems control congress now...and they are masters of corruption and deceit. and sadly for the country, they have added sedition and treason to their growing repertoire of practiced arts...

2007-03-28 23:00:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

What do you think put us in Iraq?

2007-03-28 22:42:20 · answer #6 · answered by Jose R 6 · 0 3

where do I sign up.

2007-03-29 02:45:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers