I truly appreciate this question.
To all those who give the token thumbs down to a question like this, or use the juvenile retort of "conspiracy-nut job," please, take some time to seriously analyze the unanswered questions surrounding the 9/11 attacks.
Interestingly, the burden of proof is no longer on the "conspiracy theorists" but on those who have stood by the government's official claim that 19 hijackers with box-cutters financed by Bin Laden, crashed 4 planes without any chance of prevention.
The following is irrefutable:
Fact: Bin Laden is NOT wanted by the FBI for the 9/11 attacks. Check out the FBI website. Reason? They don't have sufficient evidence to convict him. Perhaps this is why Bush said he really doesn't care about him.
Fact: There are hundreds of televised claims from that day that witnesses heard or felt explosions prior to the collapse of the towers. These include firefighters, police, newsreporters, and civilians.
Fact: 47 story - WTC 7, we are told, collapsed from fire alone. This was unprecedented for a steel frame building. Furthermore, it fell symmetrically in free fall speed. Science and deductive reasoning will easily support the cause of this collapse as demolitions. Fire does not have the energy to do this. Besides, Larry Silverstein declared on TV that they “pulled” building 7. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0scE7bQWdk )
Fact: The steel from WTC was shipped overseas before an investigation was even opened. This is the greatest destruction of evidence in the history of forensics.
Fact: Thousands of first responders have been afflicted and some have even died from respiratory failure. The government will not support investigations into the many reports which show that these heroes have micronized steel, glass, and concrete in their lungs. Fire, and the collapse from gravity would not produce this type of dust. Demolitions, however, supports the evidence.
Fact: We were told that NORAD didn't intercept any of the planes that day. This spans from about 8:24, the time of the first report of a hijacking, to 10:06, when the last plane crashed in Penn. NORAD's has a prior track record of intercepting planes within minutes. Standard Operating Procedure was not followed that day. They also changed their story several times.
Fact: The investigation into 9/11 was initially opposed by the Bush Administration. The 9/11 families pressed for one. They got it, but with remarkable conditions. The total costs of the investigation, including the NIST report, was only $16 million. The cost to investigate the Space Shuttle crash - $50 million. The cost to investigate Clinton - $42 million. In other words, the greatest failure of our defenses deserved less money than the shuttle and Clinton's perjury. What an insult to the 9/11 families.
Fact: No one has been fired for 9/11.
Fact: The spike in put options on Boeing, United Airlines, and American Airlines were never investigated. Millions are still unclaimed. This indicates someone knew. Why not check out this lead?
Fact: The August 6, 2001 Public Daily Briefing Memo was titled BIN LADEN DETERMINED TO STRIKE IN THE US. Yet prior to its declassification, we were told by Rice and Fleisher that there were no warnings. Had this news been made public, couldn't travelers, law enforcement, and the airline workers have been a little more guarded or informed to notice something that day? Wouldn't we have guessed right away that the first report of a hijacking was indeed a terrorist? Or would we have dismissed it as "one bad pilot" and continued to read "My Pet Goat" while America was attacked?
The bottom line - If the deaths of 3000 people occurred under the control of a corporation, people would have been brought up on charges of criminal negligence. Despite the growing movement and mounting evidence into the WTC collapses, the government still has made up its mind that it is fire that brought these buildings down and that 9/11 was simply a failure of imagination. They feel no one is to blame. This was the conclusion they had prior to the investigation. What the 9/11 Commission produced is the anti-thesis of the scientific method. Much of the evidence was outright omitted by them since they determined the conclusion prematurely.
If you were an underwriter at an insurance company, or an architectural engineer, or a fire marshal, wouldn't you want to know what really happened in these buildings? If you were a pilot, or and FAA employee, wouldn't you want to know which NORAD employee stood down or messed up that day?
To dismiss the overwhelming evidence that explicitly shows how hundreds of questions remain unanswered suggests a cover-up by our government. Conservative thinking has taught us to keep government in check 100% of the time.
More and more people are joining the 9/11 truth movement. We are unstoppable. To deny the smidgeon of facts presented here and the many others unmentioned is akin to being like those who have denied the Holocaust. It's intellectually dishonest.
Go ahead and give this thumbs down if your patriotism is of the cheapest kind. Yours is the kind that our forefathers would have laughed at. They demanded that we question authority, as they did. Our Constitution provides us with the means to explore the truth and to keep the government in check. But even the Constitution has been threatened as of late.
So, give it a thumbs down if you wish to cling to your cheap patriotism and your unconditional loyalty to a president and a government that has demonstrated nothing but contempt for accountability, truth, Constitution, and most importantly - the 9/11 families and surviving rescue workers who continue to suffer.
Peace. And pray for the truth.
Source(s):
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501&q=loose+change
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7895306224389722116&q=9%2F11+first+responders
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6606909833563454569&q=9%2F11+first+responders
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0scE7bQWdk
credit to Rob in NY.
2007-03-28 22:21:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by gabriell_021 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
Anyone who answers that question without looking for the facts and evidence available is a complete idiot. It is your right and most important your duty as an american citizen to question the Gov;t. and protect our constitution, bill of rights, and declaration of independence. There is solid scientific evidence and a huge number of americans who don't believe the story. If you don't question the official version you must be living in denial.
2007-03-28 22:49:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by Kris W 1
·
3⤊
3⤋
Do you wonder why you hate the President So bad that you would be willing to go through life so blind that you cannot admit any and all conspiracy theories have been debunked by actual experts and not the kooks the tin foil the crowd trot out?
I believe that the official version is 99% accurate. And your quote from FDR has no relevance. 9/11 didn't happen in government. It was perpetrated by Al Quaeda
2007-03-28 22:29:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by meathookcook 6
·
6⤊
6⤋
No, I think that the Clinton administration was far more culpable than the official record shows. Of course we will never know the truth now that Sandy Burger has stolen and destroyed the only copies of the records that would tell us.
.
2007-03-28 22:48:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jacob W 7
·
3⤊
3⤋
Read and be enlightened:
"The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions", by David Ray Griffin.
2007-03-28 22:39:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
Yes I do question the official version of 9-11. I question it to the point where I dont believe it at all. I put nothing past the American government when it suits their own agenda. I know what they are and what they have done in the past. They call the truth conspiracies so the masses will reject it.
2007-03-28 22:34:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by Perplexed 7
·
6⤊
6⤋
J. Edgar Hoover is not a very good source and FDR clearly stated "Nothing in government..." which would indicate that you believe the events of 9/11 were somehow "in the government."
You can be sure the events of 9/11 were well planned - by alQaeda.
2007-03-28 22:28:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by LeAnne 7
·
5⤊
6⤋
Of course I do! For many many reasons, but don't give up, just because your first few answers were really shortsighted! Those who question the official story are growing in number every week, and the real truth has to come out, at some point in the very near future. I guess we just have to understand that they don't want to look at our questions, because they are afraid to not believe in the official version.! *sm*
2007-03-28 22:34:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
5⤋
No. Here's your sign...
WTC Collapse: News prediction (debunks BBC was forewarned theory)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1LetB0z8_o
WTC 7 Fire (debunks no major fire in building)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Afb7eUHr64U
WTC 7 Collapse (debunks entire building magically fell simultaneously)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLHwvwJCmgk
WTC 7 Conspiracy Theory Debunked (source)
http://www.debunking911.com/
2007-03-28 22:40:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by Chi Guy 5
·
3⤊
2⤋
Since I have not only not heard, but can't conceive of a rational story to support the claim that 9/11 was an inside job, I'll just continue on my merry way believing the truth.
2007-03-28 22:29:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
7⤊
6⤋