f(x) = -xe^(-x) - e^(-x)
f'(x) = -e^(-x) +xe^(-x) +e^(-x) = xe^(-x)
So value f(x) over the interval [1,infinity)
f(1) = -2e(-1) = -2/e
f(infinity) = 0?
answer is 2/e
my head hurts
2007-03-28 15:21:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
â
â« (x e^(-x) dx )
1
First off, since this is an improper integral, we *have* to express it as a limit.
lim â« (1 to t, x e^(-x) dx )
t â â
Now, we use integration by parts.
Let u = x. dv = e^(-x) dx
du = dx. v = -e^(-x)
lim [ -xe^(-x) - â«(-e^(-x) dx ) ]
t â â
lim [ -xe^(-x) + â«(e^(-x) dx ) ]
t â â
lim [ -xe^(-x) - e^(-x) ]{evaluated from 1 to t}
t â â
Evaluate the limit at the bounds.
lim { [ -te^(-t) - e^(-t) ] - [ -(1)e^(-1) - e^(-1) ] }
t â â
The next few steps will be simplifications (grouping like terms, cancellations, etc..)
lim { [ -te^(-t) - e^(-t) ] - [ -e^(-1) - e^(-1) ] }
t â â
lim [ -te^(-t) - e^(-t) ] + e^(-1) + e^(-1) ]
t â â
lim [ -te^(-t) - e^(-t) + 2e^(-1)]
t â â
The only troublesome term is the first one, because evaluating it at infinity yields the form [â * 0]. Let's change that by moving e^(-t) to the denominator.
lim [ (-t/e^t) - e^(-t) + 2e^(-1)]
t â â
Let's evaluate the other two terms, to get them out of the way. As t approaches infinity, e^(-t) approaches 0. Also,
As t approaches a constant, the constant is just itself. Therefore, we have
lim [ (-t/e^t) ] - 0 + 2e^(-1)
t â â
lim [ (-t/e^t) ] + 2e^(-1)
t â â
Applying L'Hospital's rule, we get
lim [ (-1/e^t ] + 2e^(-1)
t â â
Evaluating the limit gives us the form [1/â], which is 0, so our final answer is
0 + 2e^(-1)
2e^(-1)
2/e
2007-03-30 23:11:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by Puggy 7
·
0⤊
1⤋