For now, it's probably the smart decision because the PS3 doesn't have as big of a game library as the 360. But in the future, it was probably the wrong decision because the PS3 will have more games than the 360.
2007-03-28 16:08:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
why don't you simply ask him?the 360,in my opinion,is just as good as a ps3 but cheaper and it has a great line up of games.it really comes down to what your friend likes.why does this have to be a competion?i can't figure out all those "geniuses" out there who INSIST that the PS3 is a better machine.what are they basing this opinion on?the PS3 has only been out 5 months,you can't even say it has a line up of games to even say that it is better than a 360 when the 360 has over 100 games.the 360 has been out for over 18 months and it has been proven to be a better console than the PS3 because of the obvious facts stated above.i also know several people who own 360s and are extremely happy with it.just because the PS3 is more expensive,it doesn't make it a better console than the 360.besides you are paying half that money on blu-ray.the ps3 has no more than 15 games out and half of them are on the 360 probably.the graphics are incredible also on the 360.maybe the PS3 will do better in the long run if they cut there price down and create more games.so to all you PS3 nut jobs out there,let me say this:in a court of law there has to be evidence to declare a certain fact.what evidence can you really base the PS3 being better than the 360 when it hasn't been out there long enough and with a small amount of games to support it?
stop bashing the 360.it has its very good points.and you all know what they are=gears of war,bio-shock,lost planet,!!!halo 3!!!and many more plus great online capabilities.all this has been proven to say that the 360 is a great console and worth the money which apparently is a lot cheaper than the PS3.OOOHHH!!! i forgot to mention that the devil may cry series will be going on the 360 eventually and resident evil 5 will be on it as well in 2008;UHHMM weren't these titles SONY exclusives not too long ago???
2007-03-28 23:43:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by wolverine 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
first of all mircosoft XBOX 360 is nothing at all.
But why did i say that
very simple
the xbox 360 u use is only the collection work of different companies working together under contract of microsoft.
vga card by ati and every thing is made by different companies is i dont think microsoft even assembled its parts
they just paid money to diff companies and made them do work for them.
so actually we can say microsoft is doing the most dumb thing
they r using others hardware but then tagging their name on it so is just stupid thing
but playstation uses mostly of its own hardware but ita a shame they used other companies for contract after seeing microsoft doing this . they did say that what type of competition is this in which u dont even make things by urself remember that playstation 2 was mostly sony own made not many companies were hired but xbox just hires and hires and hires and this will get them to a loss later on
so what i mean to say
ps3 is better and was not a good decision
and it will market more later on
metal gear,tekken,silent hill 5, resident evil 5, and mostly if any GOD OF war new part will surely use ps3 so ps3 will take all the momentum in no time i think playstation time comes from mid of 2007 thats when some new good games will come to view.and besides resistance fall of men is also a gr8 achievment for playstation no matter what xbox does they cant beat sony
so remember if u get ps3 u better replace it with newer version of playstation and not with xbox at all
2007-03-29 02:56:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by saad ahmed 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
I'm sorry we have a ps3. It is way better than the 360. The 360 remote is awful and blu-ray disc players go for like $1,000. You can't beat it, great graphics and hd movies. The XBox Elite was anounced, about the same price as the lesser ps3 and no blu-ray disc player.
Plus, buy a Wii they are great, too.
2007-03-29 00:45:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by Stephanie 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Smart
2007-03-28 22:11:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
if he just traded it for no extra money, that was stupid, but if he got some extra money on the side, it was smart
2007-03-28 22:01:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Very Very Very Very stupid, a PS3 is better. Why did he do that?
2007-03-28 22:08:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by henry t 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
well that wus dumb. ps3 is better
2007-03-28 22:59:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋