okay,one more time.Explain to me the official story about the pentagon on 9/11 okay?

Question

It isnt possible..........easy.I hand load my own bullets for my rifles and such.I fashioned a titanium bullet and in a controlled environmment I fired from a .270 winchester with a 1200 feet per second velocity.Guess what...titanium doesnt vapotize at that speed.@818 miles per hour hitting concrete with a 2500 MPA RATING
And lets get this straight.Lets assume that the palne did vaporize.Well then how did it carry on thru the other rings in this vapourized condition?You cant have it both ways.Either it vapourized and "was almost in aliquid state "as popular mechanics claims or it wasnt and it pierced all that concrete which leaves us the question of where the hell is it,the engines the seats etc

but most notably the huge engines with large components of Titanium

actually I do want the truth.........which is why I am asking

I am familiar with the F-4 crash test .I did some research and found out that the engines didnt vapourize as some would claim

Kevin A ...you are correct bu tthat is the muzzle velocity.Any bullet rapidly loses speed from that measured muzzle velocity .I obviously didnt hold the .270 one inch away from the concrete wall.

PRISONIN.......there are a number of renowned physics minds around the world who disagree with you.If there wasnt any I wouldnt give the questions about that day any credence

Apollo 19.....excellent point however we also have 100s of witnesses who say they saw a small plane,something that wasnt a 757 or just a vapour trail.So obviously if we have conflicting reports from 100s of people we have to discount eyewitness testimony as unreliable in this case.

The press........many things get reported but they dont all make it to the front page or any page sometimes.Have you heard of the veto powers of the owner of newspapers?If they dont want it in the paper ,it isnt in the paper

Answer 1

It surely wasn't a 757....I stopped the video as many demonstrations put forth on the web have done, and there's no site of a 757... don't you people think that you would be able to see a 757 hitting the pentagon at its regular speed with your naked eye let alone on frame by frame slow motion...

whatever happened to the man whom was being arrested by government officials because he had a great view of what happened.. I saw this live, but we never heard about this man again.. where did he go?

Answer 2

the pentagon was not hit by a 757. It was hit by something much smaller and much faster. You people draw the conclusions you want to draw, but there is no sight of such plane hitting the pentagon not to mention that there was no remnants of such a large plane left behind. Every thing revolving around 911 has a mysterious undertone.

flight 93 crashes in a field, yet there is not plane wreckage. MYSTERY

three buildings fall into their own footprint at free fall speed all within a matter of hours, and all(joke, joke) from fire. MYSTERY

and then there is the pentagon. What this government is trying to feed me. I AM NOT BITING.

people need to be honest with themselves.

Answer 3

I'm simply intrigued that there's a group of folks out there that honestly think that the government would be so ballsy as to hit their own building with a missile, for whatever reason, in broad daylight on a Tuesday morning, in direct view of hundreds of motorists, pedestrians, office workers, police, etc. In this day and age of 24 hour news and press leaks and classified memo sharing, that story would be out there in a matter of minutes. There would be no way to cover something like that up.
Seriously, you'd have hundreds and hundreds of people running to the nearest camera saying "Hey CNN, I saw a big f_*king missile slam into the Pentagon". But we don't. What we do have are hundreds of people that saw a plane hit the Pentagon and a couple of loose screws that say they saw a missile or Superman or a Teradactyl or whatever hit the building.
I know I'm not going to change anyone's mind either way, but just stop and honestly think about the entire situation, top to bottom, and see if it all makes sense.

Occam's Razor: Of two equivalent theories or explanations, all other things being equal, the simpler one is to be preferred.

Answer 4

Paul. I'm not a conspiracy nut, but honest to God, I crashed my truck last summer about two minutes after driving past the Pentagon on I-95, and realizing

there is no approach
no way
to crash an airplane into that building , at that angle, least of all by someone with a couple months of flight school

maybe the people in that wing of the pentagon knew too much about what was going on that day.

Answer 5

This is serious advice: You seem to be obsessing over this. If you really want to understand what happened on that day, you need a SOLID background in advanced Physics. Go to college, and take the Physics course that engineers take. It is very tough and it will require that you have a basic understanding of Calculus. I promise you that you will not be asking silly questions like this anymore - you'll KNOW the answers.

But in the mean time I will tell you this - very little of the plane "vaporized" and not very much of it was in a "liqiud state". Planes are very light and full of air while bullets are solid. They will act differently when subject to similar situations. The "liquid state" they refer to is a comparison to how the plane would act in that situation, NOT that the plane was ACTUALLY LIQUID.

Answer 6

A 757 never hit the pentagon. The real question is why was the plane not inercepted? If you have not seen Morman Mineta's testimony it is excellent.

Answer 7

Boy you don't reload very much or very well do you? I do reload and my .45 ACP go almost 1200 fps. A .270 goes 2850 fps which is more than twice the 1200 you said. The plane was aluminum NOT titanium and with intense heat it will melt into little puddles.

Sorry Libby, you gotta lie better than that.

Answer 8

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3214024953129565561&q=screw+loose+change

This explains it well. Takes a few minutes to get to it, but dispels all that garbage. How did the "Tomohawk" hit 5 seperate light post AND a power generator, not explode, then go throught the pentagon, since they explode on impact? Give it up.

Answer 9

Peices of the airplane were found at the site. Enough with this conspiracy theory, it makes you look like a fool.

Answer 10

Yes, yes, yes, now take your valium and lie down for a while.