For What?
2007-03-28 14:56:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Becuase, Politics is a game, and all the politicians are players in the game. Traditionally, Democrats & Republicans, Federalist & anti-Federalist have respect for the leadership of the opposing side. This is why in 2000 Al Gore didn't support a re-count of the vote even though he won the popular vote, the electoral college is a tradition. Not only that, Bush hasn't done anything wrong. It was our Congress that approved the Iraq War with a majority vote. Hillary Clinton, Joe Lieberman, are key example democrats that voted for the war. Not only that, Bush in 2004 had over 50 percent of the vote, which is incredible in Countries today. With a majority of the nation supporting Bush, there's no hope for Liberals too impeach him, only activists use it as a means to express their freedom of speech. Besides the point, Bush has only a year and a half left to lead the country.
2007-03-28 15:07:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Scotty 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I have been married for 28 years and I do not like someone lumping me in with the likes of Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton also commited perjury. That's a crime. Bush has not commited a crime. I know you liberals hate the man, but you will have to get over it. We have the highest stock market in history. The best interest rates in 20 years allowing more Americans to own homes than ever before. He cut our taxes. And he appointed conservative judges as he said he would do. Maybe the men you know are not good, hard working devoted husbands, but we are still out here. Maybe you hang out with the wrong crowd.
2007-03-28 15:50:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No impeachable offenses, my dear. He's a scumbag, but not to the point of impeachment. Clinton, on the other hand, was not impeached for getting head, but for lying under oath. Even after that, he was not removed from office, so why would you think that doin it to Bush would solve our problems? Its like an official slap on the wrist from Congress, it means very little.
2007-03-28 14:53:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by Tucson Hooligan 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I know it is amazing that something as stupid as lying about having an affair can get one President impeached & another President who is responsible for the deaths of thousands by starting an illegal war can't be touched. Typical screwed up Washington politics.
2007-03-28 14:56:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Amen. whats worse, getting a quickie and turning the national debt to a positive or turning the debt into a decade long process to get even again, and killing soldiers for oil. you know why they say democrats always raise taxes, its because the republicans always spend like a wife.(just making a stereotypical statement, no harm, no foul) democrats are the husbands and the republicans are the wives, and people say the democrats are like women. just like marriages in this country. divorce is on the rise. there should be no parties when people run for president, they should just say what they believe on each topic and people can vote on that, and if they dont stand true to what they say, not congress, but the people can impeach the president. land of the free, no? We need equilibrium in this country.
2007-03-28 14:47:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by Reganomics 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
This is an extremely easy question to answer.
President lied under oath and admitted to it.
President Bush has not committed any impeachable offenses.
2007-03-28 14:40:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by InReality01 5
·
4⤊
3⤋
because everybody likes to hate on bush
2007-03-28 16:24:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by joe 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush has not done anything illegal and i have never lied under oath
2007-03-28 15:54:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
simple, since bush hasnt done anything wrong, the democrats cannot prove that he did...without falsifying the evidence that is...and they have proven very bad at that so far...
2007-03-28 15:14:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Getting BJs from fat interns wasn't the only thing he was trying to hide:
http://www.nytimes.com/library/world/asia/030699china-nuke.html
2007-03-28 14:59:00
·
answer #11
·
answered by data_disaster 2
·
0⤊
0⤋