English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

As they would lose the attention they obviously crave, wouldn't they have to either learn to ask meaningful questions, or find another forum for their fantasies?

2007-03-28 13:48:49 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

16 answers

It would be nice to have a conspiracy theorist section on Y!A. That way they can feed off each other and leave the rest of us alone. There are only about 2 of them who constantly spam. They just have several accounts and apparently no life.

Burning Bush ( AKA Nancy)----Just like the way you try to delete all of my answers?

I love how all the conspiracy theorists come out of the woodwork to answer your question. What a bunch of frauds.

2007-03-28 14:01:49 · answer #1 · answered by TRUE PATRIOT 6 · 6 6

multiple people do "floor" arguments that are actually not anchorerd in meaning, good judgment or perhaps worry-unfastened trouble-free experience. they are able to pivot on any notice that motives an emotional outburst and hop from subject remember to unrelated subject remember. that's truly complicated to attempt to talk with those people. they in simple terms make no experience. those infantile people usually lack sufficient intensity theory to have an person communique. you will possibly be conscious a loss of concentration once you stare deep interior their eyeballs and be conscious a shallow "glazed" look. they are able to't truly be helped by way of fact they lack the kit of intelligence. the superb component to do is clarify issues particularly that they comprehend and then stay away from extreme communicate with them. right that's all you need to renowned approximately crime and victimhood. that's smart to be prudent, and risky to no longer be prudent. yet no remember the behaviour of the sufferer, it by no ability absolves the offender. A offender is in simple terms individual who commits a criminal offense, and everyone who commits crimes must be taken care of as a offender. So if somebody desires to weave a floor argument explaining how the strategies of precise and incorrect are subjective, which makes them beside the point, and that the offender behaviour became in ordinary terms achieveable by way of negligence on the component of the sufferer and hence it became the sufferer's fault no longer the offender's, then I advise you tell them that committing any crime is a sin. that's that straightforward.

2016-10-01 21:19:53 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

ridiculous conspiracy theory- the 'official' one.

As for asking 'meaningful questions', that is what we as 'conspiracy theorists' specialize in.
Address the following if you can

How did Bin Laden make NORAD stand down on 9/11?
Who had the most to gain from 9/11?
Why did Bin Laden state on Al Jazeera 3 days after that he had nothing to do with it?
Why were Bin Ladens family allowed to fly out of the US after 9/11 when nobody else was?
Why did building 7 collapse?
Why were traces of thermate discovered in the wreckage of the steel of the WTC?
Why did Bush & co censor the 9/11 report and hinder the progress of it?
Why doesn't the government release the videos they confiscated of the 'plane' hitting the pentagon?
Why is the wreckage of Flight 93 spread over miles and yet no bodies were recovered?
Why were the majority of saudis who were blamed for 9/11 found to be alive?
Why wasn't Saudi Arabia blamed?
Why was a massive insurance policy taken out for the WTC a month before 9/11?
Why did the government lie about weapons of mass distruction?
Why were people warned about 9/11 in advance yet Bush denies all accusations of having prior knowledge?
Why did the firefighters on the scene of the WTC collapse claim to hear multiple explosions just before the collapse?
Why was there an exact government drill running the very same day, where the odds of this happening are over a million to one?
Why did the CIA come up with Operation Northwoods in the 1960's, which involved hijacking passenger jets by remote control and crashing them into skyscrapers (planting evidence that it was caused by cubans)- as a pretext to rallying the masses
I could fill another 100 pages here you know.But why dont you start by answering some of these points
Kenshao........sorry you covered the salient points so well that I thought it might bear repeating

2007-03-28 14:27:03 · answer #3 · answered by Paul I 4 · 3 6

Nothing would happen to us! As one person said, you are in the minority. I even found that to be true at my job the other week. You got some really great answers, but I bet you won't even read them, because you don't WANT to know the truth. The truth is that we are not the theorists, we are the truth seekers. Those who swallow, or perpetuate the "OFFICIAL STORY" are the real theorists, and either are, or aid, the real terrorists. *sm*

2007-03-28 15:26:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

That won't happen because not everybody is as ignorant and closed minded as you. Some people will always hear the truth, regardless of how painful it is. I'm guessing you're referring to 9/11.. I wish people would ignore the most ridiculous conspiracy theory- the 'official' one.

As for asking 'meaningful questions', that is what we as 'conspiracy theorists' specialize in.

How did Bin Laden make NORAD stand down on 9/11?
Who had the most to gain from 9/11?
Why did Bin Laden state on Al Jazeera 3 days after that he had nothing to do with it?
Why was this video not shown on mainstream television in the US?
Why were Bin Ladens family allowed to fly out of the US after 9/11 when nobody else was?
Why did building 7 collapse?
Why were traces of thermate discovered in the wreckage of the steel of the WTC?
Why was some of the debris of the WTC still red hot weeks after 9/11?
Why are the buildings which collapsed on 9/11 the only steel skyscrapers to have ever collapsed 'officially' due to fire?
Why did Bush & co censor the 9/11 report and hinder the progress of it?
Why doesn't the government release the videos they confiscated of the 'plane' hitting the pentagon?
Why is the wreckage of Flight 93 spread over miles and yet no bodies were recovered, nor was a crash crater ever found?
Why were the majority of saudis who were blamed for 9/11 found to be alive?
Why wasn't Saudi Arabia blamed?
Why was a massive insurance policy taken out for the WTC a month before 9/11?
Why did the government lie about weapons of mass distruction?
Why were people warned about 9/11 in advance yet Bush denies all accusations of having prior knowledge?
Why did the firefighters on the scene of the WTC collapse claim to hear multiple explosions just before the collapse?
Why was there an exact government drill running the very same day, where the odds of this happening by chance are over a million to one?
Why did the CIA come up with Operation Northwoods in the 1960's, which involved hijacking passenger jets by remote control and crashing them into skyscrapers (planting evidence that it was caused by cubans)- as a pretext to rallying the masses to support a war in Cuba?

Most importantly- Why do retards like you not question these things????

2007-03-28 13:54:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 7 8

I already do ignore them. I wouldn't waste my time responding to them or reading their endless copy and paste questions and answers.

2007-03-28 18:04:13 · answer #6 · answered by Jan 7 · 1 1

If you had common sense you would realize that the official version of 9/11 is a conspiracy theory, so your question is irrelevant. We would shut up if the issue is debated and a new investigatin is launched, until then the movement will continue to grow and there is nothing you can do about it. A Scripts Howard poll shows that 86% of Americans do not believe they were told the truth about 9/11. so you are the minority.

2007-03-28 14:08:22 · answer #7 · answered by Luke F 3 · 6 6

Well two of the answers are from one C.T. that uses many accounts to propagate nonsense. I agree. It's like a small child throwing a tantrum. If you disagree you'll get a slew of notice of violations from all their accounts, but they want you to respect their right to free speech while they fight yours.

2007-03-28 14:26:16 · answer #8 · answered by ohbrother 7 · 5 2

Hey, don't go wishing that. I use them as examples when I quote the need for alternatives in exploration of the sciences.

If one alternative is good enough to teach in college [and believe it or not they have a class on WTC alternative theory] then why not another?

2007-03-28 13:57:37 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 4

This is an obvious conspiracy against conspiracy theorists.
Tell the truth now. Did the government put you up to this?

2007-03-28 14:02:30 · answer #10 · answered by Toeless_Joe_Jackson 5 · 9 4

fedest.com, questions and answers