She has accomplished an incredible amount in her life, been working to help people since she was a kid. People don't like her because of right wing propaganda. They don't bother to check the facts.
2007-03-28 13:40:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by crct2004 6
·
3⤊
6⤋
She can be a Senator for the rest of her life for NY. There's a hundred of them. Big deal. But there is only one president and frankly, as first lady all she wanted to do was get health care reform passed and look what happened there. She was secretive (not unlike today's president, but he isn't the issue here) and inept when dealing with people.
This is from Brad DeLong:
My two cents' worth--and I think it is the two cents' worth of everybody who worked for the Clinton Administration health care reform effort of 1993-1994--is that Hillary Rodham Clinton needs to be kept very far away from the White House for the rest of her life. Heading up health-care reform was the only major administrative job she has ever tried to do. And she was a complete flop at it. She had neither the grasp of policy substance, the managerial skills, nor the political smarts to do the job she was then given. And she wasn't smart enough to realize that she was in over her head and had to get out of the Health Care Czar role quickly.
So when senior members of the economic team said that key senators like Daniel Patrick Moynihan would have this-and-that objection, she told them they were disloyal. When junior members of the economic team told her that the Congressional Budget Office would say such-and-such, she told them (wrongly) that her conversations with CBO head Robert Reischauer had already fixed that. When long-time senior hill staffers told her that she was making a dreadful mistake by fighting with rather than reaching out to John Breaux and Jim Cooper, she told them that they did not understand the wave of popular political support the bill would generate. And when substantive objections were raised to the plan by analysts calculating the moral hazard and adverse selection pressures it would put on the nation's health-care system...
Hillary Rodham Clinton has already flopped as a senior administrative official in the executive branch--the equivalent of an Undersecretary. Perhaps she will make a good senator. But there is no reason to think that she would be anything but an abysmal president.
From Brad DeLong, Berkeley econ prof and former Deputy Assistant Secretary in the Clinton Treasury Department, writing in 2003.
2007-03-28 15:14:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
People has different personal bias and leanings prompting some to be anti-Hillary if their issues are not carried by her.
2007-03-28 13:40:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
She's married to Bill Clinton. That, in itself, is enough for the right to hate her.
She would give us a modern health care system instead of the mess we currently have, and prove the republican party wrong yet again. That's another reason.
2007-03-28 13:40:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by William S 3
·
4⤊
1⤋
Ignorance.
2007-03-28 13:39:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Its Hero Dictatorship 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Waco, Ruby Ridge, Vince Foster, James McDougal...need I go on; Comrade?
2007-03-28 13:52:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Finn 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
She's fake. She's not authentic. She'll say and do and change any position to ahieve power. Basically, she's no different than most politicians. I just don't like her, personally. Thats what it comes down to most of the time. She's not a very likeable person.
2007-03-28 13:41:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by greatlakesdude 4
·
6⤊
0⤋
What makes you say that she has been an excellent Senator for New York, what do you base that on. I could say that she is a calculating, ruthless, opportunistic politician, who would do anything to get elected.
2007-03-28 13:43:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by Geo 1
·
5⤊
1⤋
Socialism.
2007-03-28 13:43:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by thewindywest 5
·
4⤊
0⤋
They just hate Clinton because of the properity and peace her husband brought.
They are also mad because he got a ******* from a woman, and all they can get are ones from little boys. (Ask Mark Foley this if you don't believe me! lol)
2007-03-28 14:23:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
the fact that she's and controlling post menstrual egotistical maniac. who would drive this planet to ruin?
or that she already ran the white house once , while bill ran the woman?
2007-03-28 14:22:17
·
answer #11
·
answered by Acts 2:1-40 2
·
1⤊
0⤋