On the replay of the (horseturd) call, you could see the puck hit the glass on its way out. The referee was not looking at the play; his head was turned in the complete opposite direction. The whistle was blown and the penalty called after the referee saw the New Jersey player in front of him pointing over the glass, indicating Spacek had thrown the puck out of play. Isn't it a bit stupid for a referee who didn't see the play to call a penalty based on the claims of the opposing team?! I'm a pretty reasonable person, but somehow that just doesn't seem right!
2007-03-28
13:13:20
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Cat Loves Her Sabres
6
in
Sports
➔ Hockey
I wasn't particularly mad about a bad call; I realize that they happen and I usually keep my mouth shut because they do go both ways. I was mad because the day referees start taking the players' words for what happened when they couldn't see a play, the NHL loses its credibility completely and totally.
2007-03-28
13:54:17 ·
update #1