2007-03-28 13:00:01 · 15 answers · asked by mesmerized 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
Charles was christened Charles Phillip Arthur George. I think that he is more inclined to choose George for his coronation name rather than Charles or Henry.
2007-03-31 07:11:34 · answer #1 · answered by spearchukka2003 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I assume you're asking this question in regards to the name Prince Charles might choose when he ascends the throne. There have already been two Charles's, so it would have to be King Charles the 3rd.
Why not use an even older name? I suggest "Offa," the first ruler to be called "king of the English" back in the late eighth century. There was only the one, so he could be King Offa the 2nd. Of course, he would then be open to all sorts of very bad puns like "the king is Offa his rocker" and other such ilk.
What about Ralph?
2007-03-28 17:07:15 · answer #2 · answered by inactive account 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
King Henry the 9th - sounds like it's from a long line of Kings.
2007-03-28 13:03:10 · answer #3 · answered by Wildrover 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd go with Henry IX. Charles the 2nd wasn't that great of a king
2007-03-28 13:07:20 · answer #4 · answered by Purdey EP 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Charles II sounds definitive Henry IX sounds like another in a long list.
2007-03-29 13:40:56 · answer #5 · answered by unclefrunk 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I suggest King Henry 9th. Beside No. 9 is a lucky number.
2007-03-28 15:35:02 · answer #6 · answered by kibbs 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Charles II
2007-03-28 13:57:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well it will be william V King of The United Kingdom The Defender of Our Faith ANd sovereign of The COmmonwealth After Charles he also has suggested that we may use the regal name George VII
2007-03-29 07:19:18 · answer #8 · answered by Lord Advisor 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
King Charles the second has a better ring to it.
2007-03-28 13:11:21 · answer #9 · answered by vivib 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
King Charles II is dead. Perhaps Charles III would be better.
2007-03-29 00:36:51 · answer #10 · answered by Jim 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋