thats bad. i did the 50 in 7 second which means i prob could have done the hundred in 15. im fast so maybe add 3 secs on that for a normal peron. thats only 18. 23 is 5 secs later which is slow. i suggest exercise
2007-03-29 16:18:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by melanie h 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
i actually do track now. ill admit i run a 13.2 100m dash which wont win very much but thats not important. some people arent fast. some people are naturally slow. some are fat, some arent. some are old and some are young. in general, a 23 second 100m is not good but maybe your a guy who had knee surgery and thats why youve been sittin around... or maybe you're overweight...or a guy that just isn't fast.
2007-03-28 22:54:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by ETay89 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
How old are you ?
If you are young then that time ain't good.
I am young but not athletic, I can hardly run 100 meters in 30 seconds. So you are not alone fella !!!
2007-03-28 22:30:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
dude... thats a 6 minute mile pace... considering the fact that 11 year old girls can smoke that... 23 second 100 isn't fast at all in any way shape or form
2007-03-29 13:21:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by hahree 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I could speed walk it in 23 seconds
2007-03-29 09:42:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by John L 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
i did it in 19
2007-03-28 19:33:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
in the 8th grade i probably ran it in 14 seconds, 23 seconds is not good
2007-03-28 19:38:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by go cavs 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Might be competitive in the Special Olympics.
2007-03-28 19:38:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by Doctor J 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are people in high school track who can do it in less than half that... but for someone who doesn't run much I guess it's not bad.
2007-03-28 19:42:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by Wildernessguy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, I am 55, and could have done that while stopping and ordering a hot dog.
2007-03-28 19:36:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by redskinshort 2
·
0⤊
0⤋