2007-03-28 12:25:21 · 8 answers · asked by dms 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Yes, but he was not convicted.
2007-03-28 12:29:41 · answer #1 · answered by The Graduate 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yup. On a trumped up charge of perjury after 6 years of witch hunt whilst they could no longer get the rest on him. He ought to have been impeached as head of STATE for mendacity to the yank public approximately Monica Lewnski. in simple terms like BUSH ought to have been impeached for beginning the Iraq conflict and bungling it so badly. yet they weren't.
2016-11-24 20:20:52 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was, but was acquitted by the Senate. Impeachment is like a criminal charge, not an offense in itself. You have to be impeached for committing something, then tried on the charges.
2007-03-28 12:30:38 · answer #3 · answered by thylawyer 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I will assume you are a youngster, or someone who was not in the US during that time. Yes he was. Reason.......he committed perjury (that means he lied) before a grand jury. The Democrats in their total support of the law, decided to leave him in office.
2007-03-28 12:35:08 · answer #4 · answered by Jim J 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
For him it worked out good, he's now 43 million dollars richer then when he took office.
2007-03-28 12:31:29 · answer #5 · answered by 79vette 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yes
2007-03-28 12:32:32 · answer #6 · answered by goldensparkler61 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No they tried but failed
2007-03-28 12:32:19 · answer #7 · answered by Mary O 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yes he was...but he was NOT removed
2007-03-28 12:30:21 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋