DO YOU THINK PEOPLE ON DEATHROW SHOULD BEABLE TO HAVE ACCESS TO THE INTERNET?
2007-03-28 12:16:34 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
they should be allowed to inhale and exhale and nothing else and it should not be prolonged too long
2007-03-28 12:21:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I easily have heard this argument till now, and contemplated it independently as properly. helpful. no rely if that's a wasted existence, in accordance to judicial and societal regulation, then people might properly be the final attempt for confusing issues like Alzheimer's and maximum cancers, such as you suggested. i do no longer think of that it is going to bypass to the factor of actual torture, like the Nazis did, nor the Alabama syphilis undertaking, yet exposing human beings to different aspects that we expect of might reason intense ailment, it may basically help. If stem cellular is a bypass, and those come from aborted fetuses, then the punishment does in nice condition the crime.
2016-11-24 20:20:40 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They should have rights before they get to death row to insure they get a fair trial without doubt, but afterwards they should not get the internet, and they shouldn't stay alive long enough to be much of an issue.
2007-03-28 14:37:09 · answer #3 · answered by Nelson_DeVon 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, the internet is not a right, it's a privilege. As for whether they should have rights though, of course, they're still human, they're called human rights for a reason.
2007-03-28 12:27:27 · answer #4 · answered by Luis 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes with restrictions just like your employer can restrict what website you go to the system surely can afford it.
So yes if it's educational or has a meaningful purpose like participating on streaming live church.
YES
2007-03-28 12:24:49 · answer #5 · answered by Justasking 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
When someone is on death row, they have given up ALL their rights so No, they should not be able to access the internet.
2007-03-28 12:21:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, to assist in their defense...There have been people freed after being wrongly convicted and sentenced to death.
2007-03-28 16:16:09 · answer #7 · answered by Dr. Luv 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know. I do know, however, that the rights of convicted felons are severely limited. It's part of their PUNISHMENT...
2007-03-28 12:21:04 · answer #8 · answered by vt500ascott 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, for the benefit of themselves and others.
2007-03-28 12:32:43 · answer #9 · answered by beez 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For goodness's sake ... why so much bloodlust? I don't think there should be any death rows. Period.
2007-03-28 12:25:41 · answer #10 · answered by mrsgavanrossem 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋