Even Republicans in Congress have turned against Bush. Yahoo! cons appear to be his last level of support.
2007-03-28 11:45:00 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Funny how cons some how turn the question to war. I guess it makes their dick's hard.
2007-03-28 11:56:21 · update #1
Let me ask you this, did any neo-con that you know let up on Clinton when he was down, they continued and continue today to try to assassinate his character. To bad he is so popular with Dems and independents, not so with the bushwhacker.
2007-03-28 11:51:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
NO! Nor was it seditious to attack democrats when Former President Clinton was down.
Sedition (bad form) is when people spread unfounded rumors, call our elected officials names, lie about them, treat them as "guilty until proven innocent" and use methods that empower our enemies to make a political point (putting political party ahead of their loyalty and responsibility to our nation and people).
That is bad form.
Do you do that? I looked and had trouble except sharing a hearsay story from a website that seemed to be single person quoting a person I've never heard in a single instance of character assassination, something they accused Bush of (he wasn't President at the time they are referring to) while doing it themselves in the article.
Kind of hard to believe in someone who hasn't been seditious at all (President Bush) vs. the many democrats of my own party who have been. Oh, there were plenty of republicans doing the same when Former President Clinton was dealing with a bunch of his own seditious citizens who didn't know the difference between sedition (which is the opposite to patriotism) vs. dissent/disagreement/protest (which are patriotic in any case that isn't in support or our enemies).
Maybe we should just face down the seditious people (again, not those who "kick political parties) and leave the republicans and democrats who are PATRIOTS FIRST, alone.
2007-03-28 18:56:41 · answer #2 · answered by mckenziecalhoun 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think that we have to stick together. Luckily, hopefully, the only political power Yahoo! cons have is that to vote. We should help them back up, not into power, but restore some of their lost dignity. That is why all the stupid anti-liberal "questions", which really are statements, are being "asked". The cons are on the ropes, and desperately fighting to come back. They are throwing mud at the wall and hoping something sticks. So don't kick anyone, because that would bring us down to their level.
2007-03-28 18:55:11 · answer #3 · answered by juddthestud1987 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
the Republicans may have turned against him, and i can't really say if they have, but the next president will set the tone for the next elections, all elections.
2007-03-28 18:55:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
He is getting exactly what he deserves. People are waking up and smelling the coffee. Next year we will once again sing happy days are here again as the Democrats win a landslide victory in the Presidency and in both chambers in Congress.
2007-03-28 18:50:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 4⤋
You are the microcosm of today's liberal Democrat. A, you don't recognize defeat when you want it. You can't deny they want defeat. They want surrender. They own it. That's exactly what this is about. It's so bad that the Democrats cannot afford victory to take place. But beyond that, you know what's really shameful to me and what is truly, truly disappointing is that you, an American, do not think victory is possible in this for the United States of America. If you don't think victory is possible, there's one opposite to victory, and that's defeat.
You think we can only lose. You want us to lose. You're telling yourself, you got your brain all tied in knots telling yourself, "No, no, no. This is not about defeat, not about surrender. We can't win. This is about securing Bush's legacy," and so forth. You think anything other than victory is going to secure any kind of a decent legacy for George W. Bush, given who writes legacies these days and who writes the history? You and people like you are truly frightening and sad and disappointing, and I feel sorry for you. When I actually stop to think that there are Americans like you, I get depressed, because you do not represent the traditions and the ideals and the institutions that have defined this country's greatness.
If you keep propagating (and you won't because of abortion) and you keep making more and more of you people who think the way you do, our country and the way it's always been and its future is threatened. If you people get your hands in total control of this country -- and you have yourselves convinced that we don't face an enemy, that we're at war with the enemy, that the enemy is only the enemy because we've made them mad -- we are truly in deep doo-doo. I go through this mixture of emotions of feeling sorry for people like you because you sound otherwise intelligent. You can speak and you can do so grammatically correctly, so it seems to me you ought to be able to figure things out, but you're so warped out there that it's frightening and saddens me. It's just very sad, at the same time.
2007-03-28 18:48:13 · answer #6 · answered by GREAT_AMERICAN 1 · 6⤊ 7⤋
I'll support anyone who makes liberals drool on themselves in impotent rage on a daily basis.
2007-03-28 18:50:57 · answer #7 · answered by George D 3 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Perhaps, but it's also justifiable vengeance.
2007-03-28 18:54:40 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
You probably kick like a girl and cons don't go down.
2007-03-28 18:49:13 · answer #9 · answered by RUSH MAKES OBAMA CRY !! A LOT !! 5 · 5⤊ 5⤋
It's not support, per se. It's just that the other side sucks so badly there's not really any choice.
2007-03-28 18:51:00 · answer #10 · answered by thegubmint 7 · 1⤊ 5⤋