IS ANYONE DISGUSTED BESIDE ME BY THE SHERIFF DEPARTMENT AND THE GOLDMAN FAMILY SELLING HIS BOOK?? I SIGNED THE PROTES THE FIRST TIME FOR OJ NOT TO BE GETTING MONEY BEHIND IT AND NOW THE VICTIMS FAMILY IS!!!!!! THAT IS STILL SICK! IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN DESTROYED AND NO ONE SHOULD GET ANY MONEY FOR IT! THEY ARE PROFITING OF TWO PPL BEING KILLED. I WANT TO THROW UP. JUST WANTED TO KNOW WHO FEELS THE SAME WAY. OR IF YOU FEEL DIFFERENT AND WHY.
2007-03-28 10:06:57 · 5 answers · asked by peachez 3 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
The Goldmans and the Browns are hypocrites. When they knew that O.J. was going to make money for the book they were outraged. Ron Goldman's father Fred Goldman said
"It is an all-time low for television. To imagine that a major network would put a murderer on TV to have him tell how he would murder the mother of his children and my son is beyond comprehension. It’s morally reprehensible to me... to think you are willing to give somebody airtime about how they would murder two people."
Now the Judge tells the Goldmans and Browns they can auction off the rights to publish the book. Now its okay for the book to be sold and publish. He recanted his earlier statements about the book now. saying "I didn't know a lot about the book back then"
How is it okay for him to sell this book that was back in November was "morally reprehensible" If you ask me Fred Goldman has shown his true color and its Green. He isn't as sad about his son as he is about not getting any money. On Larry King he said "It isn't about the money" to hell it isn't.
I never understood how O.J. could be found not guilty in the criminal trial and found guilty of wrongful death. it was wrong to do so! You can't be no guilty of killing someone yet responsible for their death anyway. It was double jeopardy! Just cause some believe he is guility does justify bending the rules so.
I know that it Jerry Seinfeld were accused of killing his wife and the evidence was found by a cop with recorded anti-semitic statements no one would find him guilty nor would they have allowed a civil trial a 2nd bite at the apple.
2007-03-28 11:32:37 · answer #1 · answered by the webpage master 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Where did you get this information? O.J. will never profit from anything. Everything he had was taken away even after he was found innocent. I believe he was innocent and check it out, I am only a percentage mulatto! By the way SteveF? With your take on things, your opinionated self would have all kinds of innocent folks looking at death penalties for c r a p they didn't do. Your assumptions are lazy and lack intelligence. Oh, you know he did it? You don't know chit! Do you? What evidence do you have to know that he was guilty? Did you ever think about the fact that Nicole was involved with some shady cops in LAPD? Maybe she knew a bit too much about payoffs to look the other way with the dirty cops when drugs would come in?
Check this out. Fact of the matter is. You convict when evidence is beyond reasonable doubt. Fact is. There was nothing but unreasonable doubt. There was no concrete evidence against OJ, only circumstantial. Circumstances can change in the blink of an eye. The jury was right in their decision to find OJ not guilty because logical people know that they were split up for years before this happened, why wait until then to commit that horrific crime? If OJ was going to take her out, it would have been when the split first ocurred, not after they had been separated for years.
I know you are misinformed because if the Goldman's and the Brown's are trying to stop O.J. from capitalizing off of something OJ penned, (which they cannot do) and thinking that O.J. can capitalize is silly. They have put O.J. through double jeopardy which I think is stupid and unconstitutional. Even if there was a publisher that took his book to copywrite, fact is, you are missing the meaning in what he is trying to say. He is basically saying, if I had done this, I certainly wouldn't have been stupid enough to do it the way it was done. Get it?
2007-03-28 17:52:28 · answer #2 · answered by sherijgriggs 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Get your facts straight. The Goldman family is NOT selling the book. They want the proceeds from any profits OJ has already made from it. They have never been able to collect a cent of the money awarded to them for the wrongful death of their son.
2007-03-28 17:20:47 · answer #3 · answered by notyou311 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Your totally right, the Goldman family is going on too much we all know who did it and he will have to answer one day, for now he has to live with it.
2007-03-28 17:23:35 · answer #4 · answered by steve f 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think if anyone is entitled to that money, the victim's family is. If not, perhaps donating it to victims of violent crime.
2007-03-28 17:14:56 · answer #5 · answered by katrose 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋