2007-03-28 10:02:39 · 5 answers · asked by asylum31 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I wasn't being clear enough in my question. What I meant was removing the ability to see what late term earmarks have been added to bills. I apologize to all of those whose answeres this effects.
2007-03-28 10:15:09 · update #1
They would not get the support from the fence sitters in the senate, therefore it would not pass. This is all about the socialist agenda, and they will do anything to get control of your lives and money.
2007-03-28 10:20:23 · answer #1 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I propose an "Add an earmark, lose an ear" policy. It would make them think twice and would limit them to two earmarks in a lifetime.
2007-03-28 10:09:03 · answer #2 · answered by Crabboy4 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They would have to be accountable to the people rather than the special interests/lobbyists. I don't think our politicians would enjoy that very much....I'm all for it! :o)
2007-03-28 10:09:56 · answer #3 · answered by ♥austingirl♥ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It will bite special interest in the butt. I would love to see a big juicy bite.
2007-03-28 10:07:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
it would make those lying pricks accountable.....
2007-03-28 10:07:38 · answer #5 · answered by reaganontherock 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋