Are America and the US troublemakers as usual? The entire world know not to tresspass and sovereign nation. Who with half a brain would believe a gps system would fail to tell the Brits where they were? In other words...why bother Iran with anything when the US and Britain are guilty of every crime that Iran may be?
2007-03-28 09:59:49 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
We are Guilty, but of letting people like you having freedom of speech.
2007-03-28 10:08:31 · answer #1 · answered by ZULU45RM1664 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Lol, keep up with the news moron, the GPS that both Iran and the Brits shows that it was on Iraqi waters, also they have a satellite photo of the **** in Iraqi waters at the time it was being siezed.
Guess you got nothing now ey? Why are you so eager for Iran to be the good guy, lol your so weak im afraid even my words here will break your soft, hair thick spirit.
2007-03-28 10:16:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The anti-smuggling activities of the Brits have been regular and on-going in that area. The Iranians reported the position they said they grabbed the Brits, and when it turned out that that position was well within Iraqi territory, they changed their story to put them into Iranian waters. The GPS shows the Brits were in Iraqi waters, period. It is the Iranians who want to cause trouble and they have. Brittan and the US have absolutely nothing to gain from "causing trouble" with Iran.
2007-03-28 10:38:57 · answer #3 · answered by sonyack 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They intruded because they are wanting to instigate another war. It's obvious! That's all Bush has been talking about. Iran having weapons of mass destruction! That's how he started the first war, and that one is not even over and he wants to start another before he leaves office to the next 3 Presidents who will have to straighten up this horrible mess that he and all his lap dogs have gotten us into.
And this of course, is just a trip in the park for the UK. That is their trait, to go and take over other countries. The U.S is becoming exactly like the UK.
2007-03-28 12:39:40 · answer #4 · answered by Buddy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You mis-state the facts. The gps system shows that the UK ship was within Iraqi waters and that the Iranians were the tresspassers/aggressors.
2007-03-28 10:10:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
apparently, the British were patroling in Iraqi waters with the reason of preventing palms being smuggled into Iraq. in many cases, the U.S. does no longer assign that is deliver to guard a British Naval operation. Why can we sense the opt for to blame the victims to that end. that's amazingly telling about the position one is coming from.
2016-12-02 23:00:04 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Where is your source? Ah Ha, a liar.
What do you hope to gain by just putting out a boldface lie like this? Are you iranian? Do you support the ayotollaH?
Or do you just walk around your whole miserable little existence with STUPID plastered across your forehead.
2007-03-28 10:20:12 · answer #7 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Iran is the troublemaker. Perhaps YA libs are too scared of them to offend them.
2007-03-28 10:15:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why would Mexicans intrude on American land?
Is Mexico a troublemaker like usual?
2007-03-28 10:04:08 · answer #9 · answered by freemanbac 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
it hasnt been confirmed yet whether or not they were in iranian waters but the americans werent involved either. of course if the british troops werent in iranian waters it means the iranians had crossed into iraqi waters which doesnt seem likely given the large UN numbers in those waters.
2007-03-28 11:54:06 · answer #10 · answered by vibrance0404 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its not like there are boundary ropes with the little floats on them. The boundary is invisible, and even on GPS, somewhat inaccurate.
2007-03-28 10:15:47 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋