2007-03-28 09:51:44 · 23 answers · asked by jeb black 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I know! It's so stupid.
That gung-ho attitude has got to go.
It's time to rebuild New Orleans, not to bomb another city.
Good grief!
2007-03-28 09:54:22 · answer #1 · answered by Magma H 6 · 5⤊ 4⤋
The US will not go to war with Iran until and unless Iran makes a serious mistake and actually does something first to us that constitutes an act of war. Regardless of what you read on Y/A, the US government does not take war lightly or think of it as a global expansion technique for the 21st century.
2007-03-28 17:06:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Maybe, and I am just guessing. . . . We have no choice, and they have been egging us on for a fight since the Hostage Crisis in 1979?
Nobody rational wants a war with Iran, but Iran wants to face us in battle. The only thing a terrorist nation respects is use of force.
These guys are cruisin' for a bruisin'.
2007-03-28 16:57:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
We know you will not have to fight in it since the military has very strict policies against inducting mommas boys, nose pickers and bed wetters. With that said if and I said if there is a war with Iran it will be waged by the Air Force/Navy fliers delivering punishing bombardment of all of their nuclear facilities and any other war making machinery.
2007-03-28 16:57:25 · answer #4 · answered by dr_methanegasman 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
If a war starts between Britain and Iran, I am pretty sure Israel and the U.S. would be involved. We would not use a ground force, but the huge naval presence we have in the Gulf
2007-03-28 16:56:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Unlike Iraq, most countries are in agreement, and will pressure the Iranian government to comply with the UN. There are still diplomatic channels that haven't yet been exhausted.
2007-03-28 17:02:44 · answer #6 · answered by steddy voter 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
War is the final option. It should not be avoided at all costs. Just remember bleeding heart liberals, that Iran's government is being the provocateur in the Middle East.
2007-03-28 16:55:57 · answer #7 · answered by regerugged 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
I gotta read this! Where is the proof? Or are you propagating misinformation?
Hey, Peace Lover: You failed to mention the Democrats, and are missing quite a few Republicans, still... Or are these the ones you need in order to paint the Republicans as the bad guys? That would explain the lack of McCain, who you cannot dispute had served his country in a combat role, even if he was captured. Being captured is not dishonorable. But, I guess that is why you didn't include him, right?
2007-03-28 17:00:07 · answer #8 · answered by sjsosullivan 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Well especially since UN resolutions are working so well and everyone, including Russia and China, are helping force Iran into compliance......................................(sarcasm)
No one wants war, but there are laws against piracy, and taking hostages off other people's ships. iran got away with it last time, maybe they will get away with it this time. But the next time they try it they should lose every vessel they have, and maybe their oilfields, then they will have to think how they can spin it as another victory.
2007-03-28 16:57:46 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Actually I was thinking that we could tell Iran that we had people [you and your ilk] who were volunteering to take the place of the hostages.
So, when you got blasted, no one would lift a finger to help.
2007-03-28 16:58:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I have the strange feeling that if our politicians who declared war, along with chickenhawks like Rush, Hannity, etc., ACTUALLY HAD TO GO FIGHT THE WARS they started, then there would be a lot less wars declared.
2007-03-28 16:57:00 · answer #11 · answered by Havick 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋