Ah yes; more fearmongering based on rumors.
Won't happen. Won't find anything because it's not a credible rumor.
So relax.
2007-03-28 08:25:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by wizjp 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Josh,
First, let me say wizjp is ignorant. I found plenty of information regarding operation bite and it is a credible source. He must be yet another administration crony placed on here to dumb down intelligent questions and debate. Now for your answer.
We are not allowing the Bush administration to attack Iran. The administration has not spoken for the people since they came to power. Not many administrations have ever truly spoken for the people. The problem we have is our government is more concerned with what the corporations and special interest groups want to achieve. Our system is designed so that the individuals who raise the most money, generally win the election. As long as our system lets the greedy rule, we will never truly be spoken for. Our Constitution clearly states that our elected officials should be by the people, for the people, and of the people. Today our government is ran by people who are controlled by the corporations and special interest groups that got them there. They owe them and spend their time paying them back instead of serving the people. The Bush administration has been defiant of the voice of the people which is treasonous. This country is being ran as a dictatorship where it is Bush's way or no way. How is that a representation of the people? If anything it is a complete disregard. I have no doubt that our government will use the military against Iran. I don't know if it will happen on April 6th but it will happen before Bush leaves office. The only we we can have a true representation of the people in our government is to elect people that will follow our Constitution and truly be a voice for us. You can help by voting for Congressman Ron Paul from Texas. He has an impeccable record and is a true Patriot. Once we start electing people who will speak for us everything will change. Until then we will keep electing people full of empty promises that will only serve their own interests and those of the individuals who paid for their election victory. Unfortunately there is nothing we can do to stop our government from attacking Iran unless the entire country rises up together and rolls into Washington and throws out our elected officials. The people are not ready for that yet. We need to look to the next elections so that the people we elect are not corporate and special interest cronies. Make a difference, vote Ron Paul for President in 2008!
2007-03-28 16:21:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by truthisinplainsight 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
What? "Numerous" intelligence agencies? "Allowing Bush" "Distracted from the 'real issues"
We "allow Bush" to perform some military functions because he is commander-in-chief of US military.
And the real issues are.....??? Seems to me that the 15 British sailors captured by Iran is a real issue. Also seems to me that Iran's enrichment of unranium and refusal to comply with the UN is a real issue. Am I missing something?
The exact timing of an attack on Iran is highly speculative. There are reports that a Russian made such an announcement. I have not read any of the other "numerous" reports.
Attack Date of 6th of April 4am.
Iran's calendar
Iran doesn't use the same calendar as the West and Muslims do not celebrate Good Friday.
06/04/07 = 17/01/13/1386
So the 6th of April in Iran would be Farvardin ÙرÙردÛÙ. Farvardin started on the 20th of March. So, that would mean the attack would be on the 17th of Farvardin. 17/01/13/1386 by the Iranian calendar.
06/04/07 = 18/03/1428
On the Muslim calendar it would be 18 Raby` al-awal 1428 A.H. or 18/03/1428
Military buildup
In addition to the British naval vessels at the Diego Garcia atoll in the Indian ocean, there is a multi-national force in the Persian Gulf. The British HMS Cornwall aircraft carrier strike group, the American aircraft carrier strike group Bremerton-based aircraft carrier CVN-74 John C. Stennis, the American aircraft carrier strike group USS Dwight D. Eisenhower and the French nuclear carrier Charles de Gaulle and its task force are all in close appoximation in the Persian Gulf. The USS Nimitz may also be in the Persian Gulf as it was scheduled for its WESTPAC07 deployment to replace the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/agency/navy/batgru-68.htm
2007-03-29 11:47:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Go with this theory, and you'll get the main jist: Bush thinks, (like all males,) that he can invade any country he wants to, because he's president and part of the male group of humans. Obviously, that is not a good way to go, but he will probably, (about a 99% chance,) ignore Congress yet again and do his own thing with Iran. And unfortunately, the US is stuck with Bush and his Administration for another, oh, gee, year and a half or so, but maybe something good will happen. Who knows? Or could there be a traitor in our midst?
2007-03-28 15:36:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by C F 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
ah yes, i have heard this stuff all before, except i think it was in 2004 that i cas told by lib radicals that i was going to be drafted.... i was 18 then and am 21 now, still not drafted
you're a flake
2007-03-28 15:49:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by Enginerd 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
If it isn't on the news or other venues in mainstream America, then you heard about it how? You're a nut case!
2007-03-28 16:29:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
wouldn't april 1 be a better choice?
2007-04-01 13:26:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by candle 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wheres your link to this info? Because I think you're just stirring the s**t!
2007-03-28 15:35:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by dave b 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
April 6th?!?
2007-03-28 15:46:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
We have no control over this administration. Blame everyone who voted for him.
2007-03-28 15:25:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋