Do terrorists support George W. Bush's tactics, according to FOX News, they do...?

Question

The statement tells American voters that Abu Hafs al-Masri supports the re-election campaign of President Bush: "We are very keen that Bush does not lose the upcoming elections."
The statement said Abu Hafs al-Masri needs what it called Bush's "idiocy and religious fanaticism" because they would "wake up" the Islamic world.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,114489,00.html

More Terrorist for Bush....

The statement said it supported U.S. President George W. Bush in his reelection campaign, and would prefer him to win in November rather than the Democratic candidate John Kerry, as it was not possible to find a leader "more foolish than you (Bush), who deals with matters by force rather than with wisdom."

"Kerry will kill our nation while it sleeps because he and the Democrats have the cunning to embellish blasphemy and present it to the Arab and Muslim nation as civilisation."

"Because of this we desire you (Bush) to be elected."

http://in.news.yahoo.com/040317/137/2c226.html

So, this kinda kills your Dems. are terrorist supporters notion, doesn't it? What do you think about all of this?

Don't call me part of the problem, I am only trying to show how our tactics of war only work against us...that is a valid point to make, and not necessarily partisan.

Answer 1

"The statement said Abu Hafs al-Masri needs what it called Bush's "idiocy and religious fanaticism" because they would "wake up" the Islamic world."

that certainly makes sense.

"He also said the consequences of having U.S. troops "walk away" will be devastating: "a Sunni minority exposed to the whims of the Shia majority, ethnic cleansing, and regional instability.""

That only does a little bit... because Saddam was a Sunni with Sunni minority ruling Shia majority... interesting they seem to think the Shia want to destroy the Sunni... I wonder why... also interesting that the majority which is who is supposed to rule in a democracy... does not seem to apply in this scenario. This bloodshed should not be tolerated however this talk of "majority vs minority" doesn't tell the entire story... and the fact that we removed Saddam and his ruling minority and who that minority was seems to have been forgotten...

the deadline is to send the message home that things need to start being taken very SERIOUSLY because Bushco does not have all the time in the world to get this sh!t sorted. America cannot wait America has other things at home to worry about.

Answer 2

Politicians running the war

Sen. McConnell said Republicans voted against setting a "surrender" date -- "because common sense tells us that politicians in Washington don't tell commanders on the battlefield when the fight is won. And they certainly don't tell the enemy that they intend to run up the white flag 365 days from today."

"Setting a date for withdrawal is like sending a memo to our enemies that tells them to rest, refit, and re-plan until the day we leave," McConnell said during debate on the bill.

He also said the consequences of having U.S. troops "walk away" will be devastating: "a Sunni minority exposed to the whims of the Shia majority, ethnic cleansing, and regional instability."

The United States did indeed change course -- a few months ago, McConnell argued. "We realized the only way we'd win this fight would be to secure the city of Baghdad, the seat of the Iraqi government and home to a quarter of its population. And we implemented a strategy to do it."

But Democrats strongly oppose President Bush's "troop surge" strategy - without giving it time to work, some Republicans have complained.

The Senate vote sends a message to terrorists that they are winning and that congressional leaders "lack the will and resolve to win the war on terrorism," said Melanie Morgan of Move America Forward.

She said her group is launching a national advertising campaign that will single out those who "seek to undermine support for our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan."

The House last week passed a war funding bill that sets a date for the U.S. to start withdrawing its troops from Iraq (no war funding as of Sept. 1, 2008, the bill says).

Democrats expect a conference committee to start reconciling differences in the House and Senate bills later this spring

Answer 3

I keep saying we are seen by the people over there as infidels on sacred territory. If they leave there will be no one to bring their ideas for the world to see because those who do are gone. There have been more radicals recruited since we started the war in Iraq than ever. That is why they want Bush to win. His firm committment to stay the course brings them recruits. If we leave Iraq they will have a much tougher time recruiting. Others in the region will deal with them and they won't bother anybody any more.

Answer 4

Why would you spend your time baiting conservatives, rather than finding solutions that work for everyone? Just because they place their priorities on different aspects of the same problems you face, doesn't make them the enemy. Political parties are not sports teams- the only way one can win is if both win. Mindlessly arguing with emotional rhetoric isn't going to change any minds, and you know it. Why waste time dividing the country further? Do you ever want to get anything done, or do you simply enjoy trolling for unproductive arguments?

Answer 5

What upcoming elections? Do you mean the 2008 Presidential election? If so, George W. Bush can not run in that election, he will have served his 2 terms as President and will not be able to run again.

Answer 6

Nope. But then I don't depend on "news" programs to determine the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth for me.

Ever hear of reverse psychology?

The fact is, no American election has ever, or ever will make a difference to the islamic fascist. They already have their agenda and nothing we do will change it in the slightest.

Answer 7

Not really. They could have been trying to mislead the American people and have them vote for the one the didn't support (the one they really wanted to have win). Kerry would have been worse then Bush.

Answer 8

This statement is 3 years old. Where did you get it, Air America?

Answer 9

And it did that's why the terrorists are so much stronger in Iraq now .

Answer 10

So does china because everything he does seems to benefit china not us.