because they really are into eugenics. its their way of making sure that the mongrels of society do not breed. but they had better be careful or the democratic party will abort itself right out of existence!
gee, was it something i said?
2007-03-28 07:26:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by afterflakes 4
·
2⤊
6⤋
Nice try, but Liberals (and the rest of the pro-choice crowd) don't 'Support the Murder of Children', they simply believe that abortion should be legal, safe, and rare.
Illegalizing it won't stop it - because if a girl or woman wants an abortion, they will get it someplace, or end up using a coathanger. If it were up the pro-life crowd, even a woman who had been raped would be forced to give birth to the rapists baby. They would also require a woman with medical problems that could possibly be fatal to give birth.
I am not a woman, nor have I ever impregnated a woman other than my wife, who gave birth to our beautiful baby girl who is going to turn 8 in May. Neither of us ever considered aborting it for a second. I would hope that no woman should ever have to make that decision, and I definitely do not support using it as a form of birth control.
It doesn't affect me, nor does it affect you. All of this 'but what if your parents had chosen abortion' crap is a null and void argument.
Now, meanwhile - war is a necessary evil. There are times when there is no other choice but to authorize the use of force against another country or group of people. This is what was done before the US went into Iraq. There was never a declaration of war (which shoots a few holes in the preznits 'wartime power' claims). Going into Iraq and deposing Saddam Hussein may have been a noble cause, however the pathetic way in which the aftermath has been handled and the rampant corruption and cronyism will haunt some members of this administration for years to come.
There was an election last fall - and the people spoke. Dubya and his pals need oversight. Badly.
So far Dubya and Co. are still acting like they have a mandate. It will please me greatly to watch them fall one by one, and as they turn on each other.
2007-03-28 15:09:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by Joe M 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hmmm...it is interesting to see what some determine to be a person.
A scientist looks at a one celled thing in a microscope and calls it "life".
We search mars for signs of "life", not expecting human form but just some semblance of cells that are alive or have been alive.
I think that the determination that an "unborn child" is not a person may have some "legal" grounds, but I cannot understand the logic that says that it is not alive.
Do you equate an unborn child's life with that of a common animal? It is ok to kill an animal as it isn't murder, and it is ok to kill an unborn child (not being a person) because it isn't "murder"?
Without stating an opinion either way, don't you think the logic is a bit flawed?
2007-03-28 14:34:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by cappi 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Why would you spend your time baiting liberals, rather than finding solutions that work for everyone? Just because they place their priorities on different aspects of the same problems you face, doesn't make them the enemy. Political parties are not sports teams- the only way one can win is if both win. Mindlessly arguing with emotional rhetoric isn't going to change any minds, and you know it. Why waste time dividing the country further?
A Straw Man argument is a type of logical fallacy, used to derail the topic by putting the other side on the defensive. The best you can hope for in employing such a tactic is a tie; because it forces you off topic too. Do you ever want to get anything done, or do you simply enjoy trolling for unproductive arguments?
2007-03-28 14:26:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by Beardog 7
·
6⤊
2⤋
Murder of children? Are you talking about the deaths of hundreds at the hands of child protective services, or the death of millions at abortion clinics.
All I know is that at least the aborted children don't ever have to deal with Social Services. Guess that's a small blessing. Either way, the dead only know one thing... that it's better not to be dead.
2007-03-28 14:28:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by This Is Me Being Grumpy 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
You know Libral groups such as the ACLU support groups like NAMBLA allowing men to have rights to having sex with young children , they protect the rights of NAMBLA but try and get the boyscouts out of buildings goes to show you where they really come from.
The Liberals try and give rights to terrorists at Gitmo but say negative things towards the military and those that protect them and give them the freedom to there views even though there views are way crazy.
2007-03-28 14:42:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by ken s in area 51 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
The belief that abortion is "murder" is a religious conviction--not a legal one. Many people don't happen to share those religious beliefs-which is their rignt. And many liberals don't suppport abortion--but unlike the right-wing "Christians" don't try to force other s to abide by their religious beliefs. This is a nation of religious freedom--whether you like it or not.
2007-03-28 14:31:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
It seems to me that if the liberals want a child, they say "I'm carrying a baby in my womb" If they don't want it the say "I'm carrying a fetus in my womb and I think I'll kill it so I won't have to take responsible for my lack of sense in not using birth control." They hate war only when a conservative is in office. When they are in office when it starts, it ok with them. I am speaking generally, here, not about all liberals.
2007-03-28 14:50:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by sissyd 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
.....because their hypocracy knows no boundaries.
I don't think it's war they hate as much as the American Military when America is at war, - at leased based on their last 40 year track-record.
It must be the same reason they pretend to care about woman's right's - unless it is an Iraqi woman's rights.
Or the same reason they pretend to care about children's right's, unless it is an Iraqi child's rights.
The same reason any one of a number of their false and pretentious pet-causes are full of double-standards, lies and sheer hyperbole when the chips are down.
That's a liberal for you. You can't explain them. They would rather see a child murderer have his civil rights, than see the victim's family have theirs. - It happens every time.
2007-03-28 14:33:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by leftsmack 1
·
0⤊
3⤋
Why do some conservatives support war which results in the death of children, support the death penalty, but are against killing non-thinking children?
2007-03-28 14:28:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by neoaltro1 4
·
4⤊
2⤋
Ah, another blanket partisan generalization with absolutely no intelligence behind it! These are my favorite... Please, for gods sake people, research what you're so angry about so you can actually form an argument! My favorite is how you use the word "children". Yes, liberals are children murderers! That's what they stand for! Gay sex and aborting full grown children, apparently!
2007-03-28 14:27:38
·
answer #11
·
answered by shelly 4
·
3⤊
2⤋