English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

now what,should we compensate iran,theyve caught us out good and proper,i think i can see why they should have nuclear weapons with countries trying to sneak in,such as britain.

2007-03-28 07:21:10 · 19 answers · asked by rebel 4 in News & Events Current Events

well anyone would believe iran over bush and blair,get real,and yes torture them for 5yrs and theyll say they are g.bush.

2007-03-28 07:34:45 · update #1

when you say who woulnt admit it with gun and machetr to their head,sorry im not refering to gauntanamo.

2007-03-28 07:37:37 · update #2

only propagana was blair an bush,weapons of mass destuction,remember.

2007-03-28 07:39:17 · update #3

smuggling arms into iraq,no you must be thinking of britain and usa smuggling arms and training taliban when russia invaded afgan.

2007-03-28 07:41:41 · update #4

hey they shouldnt be in iraq let alone iran, who mentioned that old war criminal maggie,yeah she,d have shot them when they were sailing the other way,wake up britain and usa,facts.

2007-03-28 07:46:08 · update #5

kverff,sorry about the spelling no disrespect,i think because of exactly what you say iran must have nuclear weapons,i can understand americas fear yes it is and will continue to become worlds number one target,americans cant see or understand why,who put usa in charge,they are running things by brute force,the world will not tolerate that.

2007-03-28 08:02:46 · update #6

19 answers

If the British sailors are kept long enough as prisoners in Iran, they will not only be made to admit their guilt, they will also admit that they are the descendants of the prophet Muhammad.

2007-03-28 07:26:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 11 0

Yet another useless statement from someone who does not like Britain and does not look at the facts before typing.... The British woman who was released Seaman Turney, said they had been seized in the Gulf because "obviously we trespassed" in Iranian waters and was recorded for Iranian TV - something the UK disputes.... and still disputes because even the satellite pics show they were in Iraq waters... i could go on about the Iranians giving wrong co-ordinates of where they caught them then when they realised those were not in Iranian waters they changed them.... but its pointless with blinkered people like you....ops, no ten points for me.

LOL LOL LOL....HOW FUNNY???? youve added loads of comments that have no factual base etc.... We should call this site yahoo rant go get your soap box as it seems all you want to do is just get something off your chest...lol your a total joke.

2007-03-28 07:31:07 · answer #2 · answered by 2 good 2 miss 6 · 4 1

if the british sailors were in iranian waters why were the powers that be given the wrong grid reference and iran had to change there mind to suit there purposes and personally cant see them being in iranian waters with the amount of equipment on board those boats why do you think they "confessed" to being in iranian waters how much crap was in that statement and how much duress are those guys under i wouldnt want there job at the moment and i certainly wouldnt want to be in there position

2007-03-28 07:31:48 · answer #3 · answered by arniesmum 5 · 1 1

I was under the impression that there is proof that they where in Iraqis waters!

Anyway, if they would stop smuggling in arms that are killing people in Iraq, Sailors would not have to patrol the area at all!

2007-03-28 07:28:05 · answer #4 · answered by Welshchick 7 · 7 1

It has been reported that they were NOT in Iranian waters, because the GPS recorded their coordinates.

Another bag of Tricks and Lies from Iran.

They should be sanctioned yet again.

2007-03-28 08:24:01 · answer #5 · answered by alwaysbombed 5 · 2 1

WHAT THE HEL*?

no they didn't.

You seriously believe that tripe they made that poor woman say on a IRANIAN NEWS NETWORK??

You are deluded to think that she wasn't under duress to say that. you could see the agony on her face, the chain smoking, the shakes, the quietness of voice.

That's not how you act if your "being treated well and with kindness and compassion" is it?!

2007-03-28 07:29:08 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 6 1

I would think as they weren't in charge of the vessel,they hadn't got a clue where they were. Both US and British are adamant that they were in Iraqi waters

2007-03-28 07:33:25 · answer #7 · answered by keeprockin 7 · 0 2

I think an apology will do-not compensation.

2007-03-28 13:35:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Rubbish!

2007-03-28 07:26:20 · answer #9 · answered by Polo 7 · 9 2

So who said they admitted their guilt the Iran's and you believe this, LOL.. If you believe this then you are not very bright.

2007-03-28 07:26:34 · answer #10 · answered by evildragon1952 5 · 8 2

fedest.com, questions and answers