I know for Batting titles you have to have 502 AB's prolly the same for rookie of the year.
2007-03-28 07:11:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by shady7979 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you have fewer than 60ish at bats in a season you are still considered a rookie the following year. I would guess that you only need 60 ABs to be eligible considering that you would no longer be eligible as a rookie. Everybody is eligible for ROY at least once in their career.
2007-03-28 14:17:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by holbrpa 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Games? : 120 +
Atbats? 400 +
Average? At Least 300 or up
Homeruns? 20 +
Those are the numbers I think a rookie should have to be eledgible to be the rookie of the year, theirs no mimnum number that you have to have to be on the ballot. But you SHOULD have those staticts to condsider youreself eledgible.
2007-03-28 19:45:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Fred The Sock Puppet 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is no minimum number. Practically, any player who has over 130 AB or 50 IP is eligible as a rookie the following year, and wouldn't be considered.
2007-03-28 16:07:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by JerH1 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's the other way around.
There are upper limits for PA's, IP's and days on the 25-man roster between April 1 and August 31. Once a player has surpassed any of these limits, he is no longer eligible for the ROY award in any subsequent season.
2007-03-28 17:00:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
501 plate appearances
2007-03-31 08:49:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by Rick B 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
ask chipper jones that when overrated hideo nomo beat him out for ROY honors, look where nomo is now, no-mo pitching.
2007-03-31 19:38:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by orangeice 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
not that many
2007-04-01 02:42:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by skisram 4
·
0⤊
0⤋