In which she writes "Democracy is a radical idea" and promotes the notion that socialism can be foisted ON to the population from the top down. It was locked down tight during the Clinton administration, now all anyone can do is go in a closed off room with blank paper and a pencil, and no more than two pages can be photocopied. She's obviously trying to hide the fact that she's a socialist, and we should be very scared of her real intentions to use socialized healthcare to "get us under control". There are much better ways to remedy healthcare without gutting and raping the system so she can achieve her socialist agenda.
She also said for 10 years, and it's in Bill Clinton's book MY LIFE, that she was named after Sir Edmund Hillary, but he climbed Mt. Everest 6 years AFTER she was born!
Bill, has been accused or RAPE and sexual misconduct so many times and she has never once spoken out or stood against his behavior. That makes her an enabler, not pro-women's rights! Danger
2007-03-28 06:55:47 · 10 answers · asked by BS,MS,Ph.D 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Damm right! That beeyatch scares the hell out of me. She is a wolf in pants suits!
What frightens me more is that people just don't research any of their candidates. I was with friends this weekend. They want anybody but Bush in the White House because of the way he walks. They like Barack Obama because he is clean and nice-looking, and they don't like Hillary because she never smiles and always wears bland pants-suits.
OMG, I love these people, but they are idiots. I thank God they have not figured out how to register to vote! But their views are ones that most people share, and most will not pick up a newspaper or watch a news show, or read about where their candidate really stands.
I was in Grad School with a woman who believed the internet made globalization and the global economy possible. I could not convince her that the global economy is an ancient concept that was developed when the first roads and land routes were built, long before the first sea vessel was ever created.
2007-03-28 06:59:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
The extent to which you have internalized the rhetoric of the corporate media is startling.
"Those in power are blind devotees to private enterprise. They accept that degree of socialism implicit in the vast subsidies to the military-industrial-complex, but not that type of socialism which maintains public projects for the disemployed and the unemployed alike."
William O. Douglas, former U.S. Supreme Court Justice
2007-04-01 06:34:53 · answer #2 · answered by Fraser T 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Socialism WAS foisted on people from the top down - just look at the Soviet Union.
It's absurd to suggest that because she wrote a paper on socialism she must be a socialist. Lots of people who aren't Nazis have written about the rise of Hitler.
It is fools who are so scared of conspiracy theorists like yourself that they insist we never mention the word "socialism", that condemn us to repeat the past because we don't understand it.
2007-03-28 07:02:20 · answer #3 · answered by Steve 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I believe you can find it online, I read excerpts from a students website and it is scary.
Alinski is a hardcore communist revolutionary and Hill has followed his methods and improved upon them her entire adult life. Hill is a hardcore communist, althought I think she realizes that communism cannot be had now and is working towards a fascist corporatism, along the lines of Mussolini.
If you tell a Hill supporter they are a communist you will get a shrill response because the truth hurts, like vampires the light of truth always gets them.
Remember with socialists and their followers, they are better than you and the end always justifies the means.
2007-04-01 00:56:35 · answer #4 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Glad to see Murdochs money wasn't wasted
Or didn't you know that FOX Networks owner is Hillary's biggest contributor
I guess he is hanging her out as a boogey man/ lady for the imbeciles who actually think FOX is news to focus thier simple minded hate on.
2007-04-04 08:35:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
LOL - "Socialist Manifesto" - that's great. You ought to have a standup act.
College students are notoriously idealistic and want to make waves. If you think the woman hasn't changed at all in the past 35 years, you're kidding yourself.
2007-03-28 07:04:01 · answer #6 · answered by Bush Invented the Google 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
I'll just respond to the end of your diatribe.
She would only be an enabler if the accusations against her husband were true. Nothing was ever proved, in fact the credibility of the accusers was seriously in question.
2007-03-28 07:02:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
map, he admitted ( finally ) to having inappropriate conduct with monica. so that one was proven. And c'mon. common sense man... you dont get accused of it that many times without there being SOME truth at least to it.
2007-03-28 07:09:26 · answer #8 · answered by sociald 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
she doesn't want the people to know the truth
2007-03-28 07:00:20 · answer #9 · answered by chuck h 5 · 3⤊ 4⤋
.
2007-04-03 21:41:57 · answer #10 · answered by Lefty 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋