Lesnar or Goldberg ?

Answer 1

both were good
both held titlessssssss
but i will go with lesnar

Answer 2

Both over egoed guys who thought more of themselves than they ever did the business, but at least Lesnar could usually be relied on to have a good match. Goldberg was FANTASTIC in matches that went under five minutes where all he had time to do was hit all his big moves (which admitedly were impressive) but unlike Lesnar, he was often exposed whenever he had to go out there for anything over ten minutes (with the odd exception... he had a really good twenty minute match once with DDP of all people).

Answer 3

Lesnar all the way! Anybody that says he was/is over rated must be crazy! He was one of the most domment college wrestlers in history. He ran through the WWE. By far the toughest guy there. Holly tried to mess with him and he beat the snot out of him! He was just too young for all the fame!

Goldberg was made by WCW. He was a sloppy wrestler that hurt a lot of people in the ring, and just did'nt care about it.

Answer 4

Brock Lesnar

Answer 5

Lesnar.

Answer 6

Lesnar.

Answer 7

I must say....... that's a DUMB question because that match has already happened and it was completely one-sided, Goldberg beated the living hell out Lesnar so quick, the crowd booed Goldberg for ending it so quickly!!!!!!!!!

Answer 8

I'd say Goldberg because he must have been tougher since he did win some handicap matches, not that Goldberg should have had to, though.

Goldberg's time in the WWE was a joke to me. He had it ridiculously unfair. Just look at all the interference and handicap matches had went against.

Answer 9

Goldberg.

Answer 10

Lesnar. Goldberg was overrated. He's way too greedy, plus his title reign was really boring. Lesnar was athletic for his size. He may botch some moves time to time, but he made it convincing as a bully, heel and face.