English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-28 05:56:22 · 6 answers · asked by murugesh 1 in Social Science Economics

6 answers

I'm not a prophet ,so I can't say, what it will happen in 13 years from now. But If you want a guess, let me say that for exogenous variables, like the instability of the territory, other nations opposing interests and the poverty, I'm afraid that India will be a developing country. But as John Maynard Keynes said, "In the long-run we'll be dead". So, why do we have to bother what it happen in almost two decades?
PS: I strongly believe that, a strong and wealth Indian nation will bring stability and peace to the area.

2007-03-28 06:13:46 · answer #1 · answered by tes 2 · 0 0

Well India has a large work force and the country has lots of local companies so there's not much problems in trade.
We will never know.=)

Even some Southeast Asian countries as planning to be a developed country by the year 2020 but I don't think that this will happen to them.

2007-03-30 01:04:37 · answer #2 · answered by frostholy 2 · 0 0

it's Malaysia's target to be a developed country by 2020. Not India...(as far as i know)

2007-03-28 06:06:39 · answer #3 · answered by james ong 1 · 0 1

They might double the GDP per capita with good management and some luck, but that would put them on the level of Brazil not really developed. It will take longer.

2007-03-28 07:47:49 · answer #4 · answered by meg 7 · 0 0

so you think " underdeveloped countries" problem is actually development?

2007-03-28 06:03:25 · answer #5 · answered by the Bruja is back 5 · 0 0

No. They will still be where they are.

2007-03-28 06:03:55 · answer #6 · answered by anthony 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers