He is going on and on about 'Boro and Southgate having a weakened side against Man City, when they obviously had one eye on the FA Cup tie.
Can Curbishley (and Warnock) not accept they have crap sides who are not winning and Man City were bound to win at some point?
2007-03-28 05:56:14 · 5 answers · asked by Cookie_Monster_UK 5 in Sports ➔ Football ➔ English Football
I´m a West Ham man myself, and i am no admirer of Curbishley or his boring idea of football.
People say he has a point, but has he really?! It has been practiced in the past, we did it last season, and will continue to be so.
It is hardly other managers fault that we and the likes of Warnock find our respective teams in the realms of relegation. It´s our own and we should not have to rely on others to spoil their chances just to save our R´ses.
Now if the so called offending party had nothing obvious to gain, then that would be a different kettle of fish.
So yes, Curbishley and Warnock should shut up.
2007-03-28 06:21:59 · answer #1 · answered by titus 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because they're grasping at straws to look for excuses in case they get relegated. If they just concentrate on winning their own games they wouldn't have to rely on others doing them favours. Just a case of sour grapes.
2007-03-28 09:47:30 · answer #2 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
its about time Man City did win. :)
2007-03-28 06:01:36 · answer #3 · answered by flower19602003 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no hes got a point
2007-03-28 06:09:22 · answer #4 · answered by Frihah Anti-Milanist 4lyf! 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
ur all crap, up the reds
2007-03-28 06:04:16 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋