2007-03-28
05:51:33
·
11 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
but susi, they ARE neo-con. They are not conservatives, they are the "new" or "neo-" conservatives, who are not really conservative at all. I won't call them conservative because they aren't and they would give real conservatives a bad name.
2007-03-28
06:03:48 ·
update #1
rick, don't you think if there were iranian ships off the coast of virginia, that the united states would do the same thing? especially if there was talk of war and nuclear bombs, like there has been?
2007-03-28
06:09:16 ·
update #2
susi, then you are a CONSERVATIVE, not a NEOCONSERVATIVE
2007-03-28
06:10:45 ·
update #3
neocons are trying to create a new world order, neocons spend lots of money, and still cut taxes, neocons take freedoms away from us, neocons want to exploit the illegal immigrants for more profit, neo-cons want to merge north american countries to a north american union, neocons are aiming to destroy US sovereigty and create a new world order eventually.
2007-03-28
06:14:13 ·
update #4
As opposed to the neo libs who during the 20th century who have involved our country in just about every major world conflict?
Wilson-WWI (asked congress to declare war on Germany) 116,608 US soldiers dead 204,002 wounded.
FDR-WWII (baited Japan into war) 407,316 Americans killed 786,301 wounded.
Truman--dropped atomic bombs on cities primarily populated with elderly men, women and children. After that he took us to Korea--more than 1 mil killed of which 55,000 were Americans.
JFK-sent troops to Vietnam-55,000 US lives lost.
Clinton launched attacks on numerous 'peace keeping' missions around the world-like Somolia and Kosovo and used our soldiers as police officers. As a result of his lax military policies-many US lives were lost.
The only Rep to lead us in a major conflict was GHW Bush--who destroyed Saddam's million man army in less than a week resulting in the loss of 148 US casualties.
Who are the war mongers?
2007-03-28 14:39:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Cherie 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
A good way to have peace would have been to search out al Queda. There was a search through Afghanistan which revealed training camps allegedly ones al Queda had been using. They also determined that al Queda had left Afghanistan. The search stopped and now we are at war with the Taliban.
Instead of diligently for al Queda Bush invaded Iraq on the pretext of looking for WMD. This effort was, in no way, a search for al Queda.
Bush has done a graet disirvive to the dead of 9/11 as well as to their loved ones
2007-04-03 22:29:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
World War III began on February 26, 1993. Some were / are just too stubborn to admit it. It will be over when Islam is defeated or the west converts. Which outcome do you want?
http://www.cogsc.info/Sept1106.htm
Edit: The case could also be made for Nov. 4, 1979 as the start. I would accept that also.
2007-03-28 06:03:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by boonietech 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am a conservative. And ashamed of the way this honorable word has been hijacked by the fundies and would-be-dictatorship of the Bush administration.
A real conservative respects individual freedom of choice and keeps the governmnet out of your private life.
Bush and his cronies betray conservative principles. They want to stick their nose into your bedroom and tell you what kind of sex they approve of.
They want the government to get involved in your private love life and dictate to you the gender of your spouse.
They want to impose government decision rather than spousal choice on how you die, if your name is Terri Schiavo.
They want to intrefere in the way you pray, forcing government-prescribed prayer on school children instead of leaving prayer as a very personal private matter.
Bush even wants to push a religious worldview into science classes - and of course, it's just HIS religious worldview, ignoring the many creation stories of Mayans, Hindus, Scientologists, etc.
And to facilitate the neo-cons' program of giving the state control of your life, Bush wants to appoint only judges who will go along with his plans - exactly what the Nazi Party decided to do in Germany in 1933.
2007-04-05 05:47:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by fra59e 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Drop the term Neocon ASAP! I am a conservative and the last thing I want is WW3....... so much for your ludicrous opinion!
2007-03-28 05:59:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
As opposed to what? Look at WW2 and you will see that wanting peace will not stop a war either. In order to stop a war, BOTH sides must want peace. Personally I think Bush wants peace more than those idiots in the Middle East.
2007-03-28 05:56:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by rz1971 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
To answer your own question to need to ask yourself a question. Who would survive a real world war 3? Lets say a total breakdown of all GOV. fighting in the streets of or own country. In the end it would be nothing more then PEST control.
2007-03-28 05:58:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by buzzmanrao69 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yep, it was the neocons that kidnapped those 15 british sailors, wasn't it?
2007-03-28 06:00:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by Ricky T 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
They aren't! Where's the proof for your ridiculous question?
2007-03-28 05:59:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by JessicaRabbit 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
Technically they're not, because they don't think that far ahead.
2007-03-28 05:56:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
5⤋