English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Please refer to my previous post, and give me some feedback. Like I said before, it is just a theory.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AnQkkPy7uUZ0nUZsPFCCUWbsy6IX?qid=20070328084652AAxgAtq

2007-03-28 05:29:31 · 3 answers · asked by ? 4 in Science & Mathematics Physics

What?! I am not proposing a literally theory of everything...or a theory of anything for that matter. I am simply stating a few observations which came to my head after watching a program about theories of origin on the science channel. By the way, you could not even detect sarcasm in my questions title you have no place insulting anyone elses intelligence or theory. You said it yourself; you were too lazy and arrogant to follow a link and read.

2007-03-28 07:44:11 · update #1

3 answers

You hinted at some of the inconsistencies. Most people seem to accept the 10 or so spatial dimensions required by superstring theory, even if they can't even begin to grasp a fourth spatial dimension. Yet they refuse to even consider that there might be a God who is not constrained by our 3 spatial dimensions or our time dimension.

Most people accept the idea that science can neither prove nor disprove the existence of God. I can live with that.

The big bang theories are extrapolations into the distant past. We are more likely to find out that some point, those extrapolations are no longer valid. That is much more likely than a singularity. If you see a crowd leaving a football stadium, you can reasonably extrapolate back in time to where the crowd was inside the stadium. You need not assume that the crowd was once concentrated in just one cubic millimeter of that stadium.

2007-03-28 17:44:30 · answer #1 · answered by Frank N 7 · 0 0

You never actually put forward a testable theory, so there is no scientific response to you.

You are correct that physics does not have everything figured out yet. Not since Lord Kelvin in the 1800s (before quantum mechanics) has anyone really had the nerve to say otherwise. By no means does that give legitimacy to any quasi-religious pseudoscience. It just means that we haven't figured everything out yet. And probably never completely will.

2007-03-28 14:02:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

OK, that link led me to another link and I simply am not going to follow links all day long for something that I am probably going to disagree with anyway.

Put up your full theory, along with mathematical analyis that shows me how you incorporate quanum theory with gravational effects and how you can explain the how the 5 forces interact with each other (remember, you will need proof, mathematical or otherwise) and mail me the link to that and I will be happy to go over it and show you where you went wrong.

How do I know you are wrong? If you were right, you would not be giving your theorys here, but in a scientific journal and awaiting the accolades due to a person who finally does this.

2007-03-28 13:14:47 · answer #3 · answered by Walking Man 6 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers