.
WTC Collapse: News prediction (debunks BBC was forewarned theory)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1LetB0z8_o
WTC 7 Fire (debunks no major fire in building)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Afb7eUHr64U
WTC 7 Collapse (debunks entire building magically fell simultaneously)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLHwvwJCmgk
WTC 7 CT Debunked (source)
http://www.debunking911.com/
2007-03-28 04:56:19 · 7 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No more than the foil hats they wear.
2007-03-28 05:06:43 · answer #1 · answered by Michael E 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Are you trying to say that BBC didn't report that WTC 7 was going to collapse before it did? If you are you should search the BBC website where they admit, but cannot come up with a reason why it was reported. None of those video debunk anything. You clearly have not done the research.
2007-03-28 12:44:08 · answer #2 · answered by Luke F 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't need to visit the links to answer this question. Everything about 9/11 conspiracy theorists is foolish by definition.
2007-03-28 12:01:08 · answer #3 · answered by Bush Invented the Google 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
UNFORTUNATELY PROOF CAN BE RIGHT IN SOME PEOPLES FACE AND THEY WILL STILL TRY TO FIND SOME SENSE IN IT TO MAKE IT RIGHT OR A LIE. THE TRUTH HURTS AND MOST PEOPLE COULD NOT HANDLE THE TRUTH. MOST OF THE BUSH SUPPORTERS COULD NOT HANDLE THE TRUTH. I PRETTY MUCH GAVE UP ON THE IDIOTS.
2007-04-01 02:04:13 · answer #4 · answered by Rhionnan 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I couldn't resist reading the Death Star conspiracy article. Laughed my butt off.
2007-03-28 12:10:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Of course, that's why they are called "Conspiracy theorists" instead of "alternative events proponents"
2007-03-28 12:01:55 · answer #6 · answered by wizjp 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Their not going to read any of your links, if they sought out facts in the first place they wouldn't believe any of the garbage that they do. Thanks for posting them anyway.
2007-03-28 12:13:45 · answer #7 · answered by Scott B 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋