2007-03-28 04:50:10 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Books & Authors
Did you bother to read it yet?
2007-03-28 04:57:57 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I just read it too. You can infer from the locale that this isnt exactly a police interrogation. This is some kind of a sexual game being played by two people. And what a game it is!! I must confess to having written a scene quite similar - albeit more detailed - to this for a book once. This is a power exchange situation. Clothing has a tremendous amount of power when one person has it and the other doesnt. Removing one's clothing can be demeaning and it is obvious that is the intent of this game - to replicate a police interrogation with both parties consenting to participate. It is quite the opposite of the Sharon Stone scene in Basic Instinct where she uses that little "peek" at her anatomy to gain control of the situation and throw the interrogators off balance. In this situation, it is clearly the interrogator who is holding the control in a dominant/submissive situation. I had never read the poem and it was amazing! Pax - C.
2007-03-28 07:54:00 · answer #2 · answered by Persiphone_Hellecat 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I just read it. Although I've never heard of it before, it's completely bloody awesome. I would rather call it a vignette than a poem, though. Anyways, the interrogator is eventually naked (literally), but the narrator feels naked before her eyes (figuratively). At least that was my impression. Ever heard the expression "the naked truth"?
2007-03-28 05:03:04 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Literal means it's stated..Figurative means it's inferred.
2007-03-28 04:58:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
i dont know.......
2007-03-28 04:55:40 · answer #5 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋