is allowed in the courts?
2007-03-28 04:14:43 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
i.e. speed camera?
2007-03-28 04:15:51 · update #1
no, not really. I don't agree in speed cameras though. I do roughly 65,000 miles a year and you see so many near misses around speed cameras where someone will suddenly slam on the brakes. They're infuriating. Plus, I now have 6 points on my licence for doing 36 in a 30 (both times). Now in a 30 I'm spending more time looking at my speed and looking out for cameras then I am to driving. They're a menace, and a licence for the police to make money without putting the work in.
2007-03-28 04:21:04 · answer #1 · answered by PhoenixRights 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not really these days. With the increase of many types of 'security' cameras around the country, you'd be hard-pushed not to feature on one sooner or later. Of course, if there were to be a sudden increase in the sale of black spraypaint, ski-masks and ladders, maybe somebody else would have a different take on it!!?
2007-03-28 11:35:31 · answer #2 · answered by michael w 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, not strange at all.
More disturbing is how some people get away with everything despite it being on film.
Snakes and grass spring to mind.
2007-03-28 11:22:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No its called moving with the times.Technology has advanced.
2007-03-31 14:26:27 · answer #4 · answered by Ollie 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not really as it is proof surely...
2007-03-28 11:18:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
what better proof could there be.!
2007-03-28 11:20:11 · answer #6 · answered by *♥* donna *♥* 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋