2007-03-28 03:58:15 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Tell Iran to get out of Iraq. Let the government of Iraq run itself. Maybe they would have a chance then. Since everyone is blaming the USA citizens and the leadership in the USA, this makes it so easy for Iran to interfere.
2007-03-28 04:02:10 · answer #1 · answered by grandma 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For starters, the Iraqis don't have a democracy. They are subject to a puppet regime installed by the Bush administration and to the military occupation of a foreign power.
Same thing happened in Vietnam. And shortly after the US left, things settled down.
2007-03-28 04:39:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Diana unfortunately many people of the younger generation have no real concept of how these things take time after being ween on television and video games. After WW2 it took the US over 5 years to weed out the SS and troublemakers in Germany. The main thing that the US suffers from now is inpatients.
2007-03-28 06:01:54 · answer #3 · answered by Ynot! 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because different branches of islam are fighting against each other . You have the peaceful people that our military is helping then you have the radicals that believe in world domination fighting them . These radicals believe first they must destroy their own kind that do not follow the islam beliefs the way they think they should , then they will conquer the west . These are documented facts , the truth is america is selfish , if it wasn't for the overall agenda if the radicals we would just let them handle it theirselves , but when it effects americas security ( such a 9/11) we have to step in . You might say " why did 9/11 happen if first they want to conquer their own people" . The answer is bin laden believes the west should be conquered first in order to have total world domination , but other radical leaders disagree with him
2007-03-28 04:05:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sounds good to me.
They won't choose democracy, though (or even a constitutionally-limited republic, which has the best chance of working).
They're barbaric 7th-Century throw-backs. They'd kill each other first.
2007-03-28 04:45:37 · answer #5 · answered by not gh3y 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They don't know how. And all the surrounding countries emphatically do not want another democracy in the region; Israel being the other.
2007-03-31 20:13:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
because Bush wants to occupy their country indefinitely. No timetable, no goals for withdrawal there is not a single concrete reason Bush can give that would make him withdrawal troops.
2007-03-28 04:10:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
This means that their beliefs are not yet mature enough to be as "one". When you have freedom, you have a long list of things to do when you were repressed.
2007-03-28 04:02:10 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
They can and will, if someone ensures that the people funded by syria and iran will not interfere with it.
2007-03-28 04:09:51 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are trying to do just that. We are helping them get set up. You don't build success overnight.
2007-03-28 04:02:03 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋