English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

They already plan on detonating nuclear devices and destroying america . So our best chance would seem to be a plan to prevent that from happening .
Or since they have declared their hate for us and the plan to use nuclear devices we strike first . Destroying any hope they have of a home land .

2007-03-28 03:31:35 · 36 answers · asked by trouble maker 3 in Politics & Government Politics

36 answers

Nobody. If there would be any activity it would be by people like right winged Timothy McVeigh.

2007-03-28 03:35:44 · answer #1 · answered by leonard bruce 6 · 1 5

Well I never considered Iraq to be about terrorism contrary to the constantly changing justifications provided by the administration. However, it cannot be denied that terrorists are operating in Iraq and that by doing so they are expending funding, resources and personnel. This by extension means they have less of all three to use in direct attacks against the United States mainland. Once we leave Iraq this situation will change and it does stand to reason that they will resume attacks against US interests. So, my answer to your question is yes, I do believe that a pullout will result in a greater number of attacks in the United States. This being said though, I do not believe that staying in Iraq makes us safer, it just forestalls the inevitable. Security is an illusion, we will be attacked again, it is just a question of when.

2007-03-28 03:39:21 · answer #2 · answered by Bryan 7 · 1 0

They don't even have a pot to piss in so how in the hell can they get their hands on nuclear devices to destroy america?

I don't believe it will ever ever end.... Let's say we killed everyone over-there except one person. That one person could be a terrorist so, what did we accomplish? How will we ever know who is a terrorist and who is not?

Good question - I think if we had tighter security regarding people entering and leaving out country it wouldn't happen. Also, why do we need to allow anyone here to begin with? Send a letter, send an email!!!

2007-03-28 03:37:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

I don't believe any of it, all what we hear is nothing but a *******,If Sen.Ted Kennedy,
The most famous family in America was
prevented from boarding a plane because his name was similar to suspected terrorist,
Do you know how many years they need to swim to reach the U.S.A. shores ?
If you as an American can't go through
the airport facilities with a nail clipper ,
Bottle of water,shampoo,or your little tiny
knife ???? So,How in the World,some
Mideast looking Men will be able to bring in
a suitcases full of radiation and GO through ?
The only thing we must do is to secure
our borders and our nuclear facilities.period!

2007-03-28 04:16:23 · answer #4 · answered by massimo 6 · 0 0

I think that no matter what we do their will always be terrorist attacks in our country. Even if we strike first and as you say destroy their home land....do you not think their are illegals here in the U.S.A now and they are sitting there waiting with bombs attached to them just waiting for us to destroy their country so they can strike us here at home?? I think the best thing to do pull out our troops, clear out our country of anyone who is not a U.S. Citizen and control our borders and not let anyone in or anyone out. I think this will minimize attacks.

2007-03-28 03:48:19 · answer #5 · answered by Jay 2 · 0 0

Terrorist activity will increase (maybe not in U.S.A.) whether we pull out or not. I believe that we have gone past the point of no return. This issue should have been dealt with using deplomacy a long time ago.

2007-03-29 06:26:11 · answer #6 · answered by Henry B. 3 · 0 0

nobody. Another terror attack will occur in the US when and where the PTB want it to happen, plain and simple. Remember, certain elitists have already stated there needs to be a global situation for the world to accept a one world government. Repukelicans tout 5+ years with no attack. It was 8 years between the first WTC attack and the second (and neither were planned by Arabs/Muslims in a cave). Democraps do nothing but complain about the Repukelicans.

Both parties would rather bury the non-elite American citizen than listen to us.

2007-03-28 03:38:04 · answer #7 · answered by irish_american_psycho 3 · 0 2

The moment you remove the pressure from them they will regroup and begin the planning of new attacks on American soil. They have continued to plan but because we are taking the war to them we have been able to stop, prevent or disrupt them.

They will come back and the whiney liberals who "cried" on 9-11 will be crying again and immediately pointing fingers.

2007-03-28 03:53:50 · answer #8 · answered by Da Coach 2 · 1 0

I think that is a possibility. Terrorist hate the US and anyone who doesn't believe what they believe. If we pull out they could think that we are giving up and think we would be an easy target possibly. On the other hand terrorist will do anything to destroy us even killing themselves so it is very hard to destroy terrorism. If we kill one terrorist another one will take their place I think it is a never ending battle. But if we stand tough they will know that we will be tough to beat.

2007-03-28 03:37:17 · answer #9 · answered by ♫Rock'n'Rob♫ 6 · 2 1

What homeland? Saudi Arabia? Pakistan? Indonesia? What about the growing muslim communities in Europe? How many innocent people do you want to nuke in order to prevent a potential attack that may or may not be a real possibility?

2007-03-28 03:50:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The U.S.A. is definitely a target in the Islamic jihad and backpack dirty nukes are a part of their declared weaponry, along with biological and chemical agents.
If the U.S.A. retreats from Iraq without a confirmed victory, the country will come under more consistent attack from all sides of the extremist world(s).

2007-03-28 03:38:06 · answer #11 · answered by credo quia est absurdum 7 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers