Should the congress have the power to end the war?

Question

According to this article that is exactly what they are doing

http://news.yahoo.com/s/usatoday/20070328/cm_usatoday/iniraqvotecongressiscastingasidetheconstitution;_ylt=Ak4SAcVOmEGAhnd6MaGQ3D_9wxIF

Answer 1

NO! They are over stepping their authority. They want to run the Executive branch from the Legislative floor and that is criminal behavior. They should be investigated and arrested for treason.

Answer 2

First off the Congress has the power to declare war, not undeclare it.

Secondly, they have the power of handling the money, so if they wish to persuade us to get out, they can just not fund it.

Thirdly, the congress never declared war, but they did authorize force.

In the end, they can unfund the military and either force us out of Iraq or leave our troops underfunded. Neither is a good idea and those spinless Dems are trying to make it look like it is Bush who is trying not to fund the troops. Why don't they simply come out and state they are no longer going to send any more funding to the troops in Iraq and be done with it. That way they can be responcible for the consequences of that action.

Answer 3

There was no declaration of war. Congress gave the president power to deploy force. They should be able to withdraw support and demand compliance with the War Powers Act. This would either demand a declaration of war or bring the troops home in 90 days.
This would likely cause a constitutional crisis and force the supreme court to step in. (Can you imagine nine people deciding the war after the 2000 election debacle.)

Answer 4

in the event that they invoke it which will recommend that the troops combating in Afghanistan and Iraq won't get any investment $$... so no kit, no ammunition... it may be as though Congress betrayed our infantrymen and left them in the open with none help. that would desire to create a backlash from all the mothers and fathers of all the warriors and the final public and the contributors of Congress does not get reelected. it somewhat is all Congressmen care approximately... reelection and public opinion.

Answer 5

It depednds on how you look at it. The Congress is responsible for funding the war. They are putting restrictions on the funding. Bush has the right to veto it and probably will, but then he will have no funding. Are they crossing a line? maybe. But given the mismanagement of the war by Bush, someone has to step up and do something.

Answer 6

No body in the US has the power to end the war. They do, however, have the power to force the America extraction from it. That war will brew long after we are no longer a part of it...

Answer 7

They need 2/3 of the House and Senate to vote for an end. That won't happen.

Answer 8

Read the Constitution. They have a lot of power over war. Just because they're generally too spinless to use it is no reason to complain now.

Answer 9

http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761554908/Congress.html#s2
I think they are overstepping their boundaries as far as the Constitution goes. They have the right to declare war and that puts the war directly in the Commander-in-Chiefs lap.

Answer 10

They do have the power. They control the pursestrings, they could recind the force authorization.