English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2 answers

I believe he was addressing art rather than society.
Maybe he was looking at art as a reflection or precursor of societal changes and questioning the origin of the direction (director?) of the change.

2007-03-28 03:00:20 · answer #1 · answered by CJohn317 3 · 0 0

below this coalition regime hundreds of billions in untaxed funds is being moved to offshore tax havens and tax loopholes are transforming into the norm.The coalition have tried to fill this hollow via borrowing ,pushing thousands and thousands of shoppers in to poverty and reducing considered necessary amenities jointly as reducing taxes for the wealthy and allowing obscene pay rises for the wealthy.the purchasers now have not have been given any disposable earnings so the full spectrum of manufacturers and merchants are suffering and preserving back with investments coming up mass unemployment.with the aid of greed and selfishness the coalition regime stay in an elitist bubble and purely signify the wealthy.this is going to take some years to repair the wear and tear performed via this regime to the united kingdom economic gadget.till taxes are gathered and ALL loopholes closed and funds surpassed back to the buyer there would nicely be no advance or economic restoration.we are able to purely pray that at some point the MP,s and their families go through the poverty and misery they have inflicted on thousands and thousands in the united kingdom.Tax dodgers and accountants who help them would desire to be put in detention center and function their wealth taken away.

2016-11-24 19:05:11 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers