Not just the fact they decided to add the amendment with a pull out date, but their was more pork on that bill than a Tennessee BBQ restraunt. I thought Dems were against pork.
2007-03-28 00:43:06 · 10 answers · asked by Big John 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Where did you get the idea that Dems were against pork? Because the Liberals around here keep telling you so? They are so deluded it's not funny.
They think pork is a strong military. And they think socialism is their entitlement for being born in the US.
But the singularly most insane thing going on is them crying about their loss of Constitutional rights, while they try to take the President's Constitutional powers away.
Good to see you, Rachman!
2007-03-28 00:50:37 · answer #1 · answered by ? 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Dems will always out pork Republicans. When the Dems in 1990 promised (via Demo House Speaker Tipp O'Neil) Bush Daddy that they would cut spending if he raised taxes and he bought in, the Dems lied, spending increased $1.53 for every dollar of increased taxes. The Dems cried that "Bush Daddy lied" about the "No new tax pledge" and he got beat in 1992.
Spending is the crack cocaine of politics and considerably more addictive; there are lots of people in office who beat coke but can't stop spending (I could name names, but won't).
I think the Surrendercrats so hate Republicans, America and Freedom that they want our enemies to win this war just to have a system that controls our lives because we are (in the Demo view) too stupid to make our on decisions.
We must defeat the Democrats and Liberals before we can win the war against Radical Islam. Liberalism may well be the worse of the two enemies we face.
2007-03-28 08:00:18 · answer #2 · answered by ? 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Democrats know how to play politics and it is the reason why they got the pork for supporting the funding of the Iraq war that they wanted stopped before the recent elections.
2007-03-28 07:48:42 · answer #3 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No Muslims are against pork. The left only care about regaining power. They believe to do so they have to embarass and attack the current administration even if that means that America loses to the terrorists. If that causes us to be attacked again at home, that is also good because had we spent war funds on homeland security we would be protected. That would be something else to blame republicans for.
2007-03-28 07:58:10 · answer #4 · answered by John B 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Democrats are the All time Pork Masters, just ask
Nancy Porklosti
2007-03-28 07:49:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Answer: They understand! The cut and run cowardice of the dems is repetitious history...Viet-Nam and Somalia jump to mind.
Their tactic of putting troops in harms way and then Selling them Out to gain political power is abominable...
And as long as they see that treachery as a working strategy, they will continue to murder service personnel to advance their lust for power.
Dems must love tragedy and failure, their socialist agendas virtually guarantee it!
2007-03-28 08:05:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
LIBERALS ARE CONDEMNING SOLDIERS TO DEATH.
It is going to be vetoed, because their strategy is harmful to the troops. They don't care whether or not the job is done, they want to incremently cut funding so that we are not able to buy armor for our humvees or bullets, or train new soldiers, which gives us no choice but to pull out. BECAUSE THE LIBS MEAN TO DENY US TRAINING AND ESSENTIAL SUPPLIES SOLDIERS WILL DIE AT A RATE NOT SEE BEFORE IN THIS WAR. This will destroy our defense forces that keep us free.
2007-03-28 07:55:54 · answer #7 · answered by Voice of Liberty 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
YES by stopping the funding, you stop support for all our troops, and YOU allow the terriorists to come here and try again. Are YOU on a blood trail that YOU would want our neighborhoods, schools, shopping malls, and domes destroyed while people are still in them.
2007-03-28 07:52:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
cheney is the porker...there was just a slice of bacon added for extra flavor
2007-03-28 07:47:12 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
No they still do not understand it is a bill to surrender.
2007-03-28 07:49:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋