2007-03-28 00:19:22 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football (American)
They both pretty much suck.
2007-03-28 00:42:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Donaovan Mcnabb
2007-03-28 07:42:13 · answer #2 · answered by Skins08' 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
B-dawk is best at his position in the league no doubt. Mcnabb is more responsible for that happens with the team. Dawkins brings more energy to the team but mcnabb is the leader you really cant compare them.
2007-03-28 11:14:34 · answer #3 · answered by Adam 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
None can be better than the other, due to the complete difference in positions they play. They are both extremely talented. However, I will answer the question with a question: Who has made the biggest positive impact on the team? Clearly that answer belong to McNabb, who led the team out of the bottom of the NFC to consistent playoff trips.
2007-03-28 09:34:16 · answer #4 · answered by PhillyFan 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'll go with McNabb, and the only reason I say this is because of Dawkins age. I think Dawkins is the best safty in the game. I also think that Mcnabb is one of the best QBs in the game and he does it without much talent to throw to
2007-03-28 09:08:23 · answer #5 · answered by hair_of_a_dog 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's kind of hard to answer because they don't even play close to the same position.
Dawkins played really well last year. Mcnab is always hurt...or it at least it seems that way.
I have to go with Mcnab because he's more responsible for what happens on offense than what Dawkins is on defense.
2007-03-28 09:03:56 · answer #6 · answered by Jeremy M 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What's better an apple or sadness?
Neither question makes sense.
2007-03-28 12:43:15 · answer #7 · answered by Water Monkey 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋