First it is important to know that Iran can not hold british soldiers for a long time, that is because Iran knows that doing so would have consequences especially with the second UN security council regulation which imposes further sanction on Iran.
Secondly, british forces were doing their daily job: inspecting merchant ships in order to detect guns smuggling into Iraq. so they might have entered Iranian borders before, but why did Iranians arrest them this time?
The answer is because in this very moment Iranian government wants to test british (or better to say western countries especially: England, Germany, France & USA) talorance; and find a clue on what might be the reaction of western countries if a confrontation was about to be setupon. So as you see this aggressive movement made by iran, is just a start on a political cat and mouse game.
So, in my opinion, british government should play a really smooth and gentle behaviour in order to hide it's hand from the Iranian government; so that they become unable to guess western countries next movement. Which would be through political negotiations and deplomatic ways.
2007-03-28 00:18:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by kiarash.nakhaei 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
Here's an excerpt from Kuwait Times
Kuwait Times
Published: Mar 25, 2007
TEHRAN/ UNITED NATIONS: Iran said yesterday that 15 British service personnel detained by its navy off Iraq had admitted to violating its territorial waters, rejecting demands from London for their swift release. The semi-official Fars news agency said the 15 naval personnel, who include a woman, had been brought to the capital Tehran for questioning about what they were doing during what Britain insists was a "routine" anti-smuggling patrol on Friday.
If England was wrong, they got caught out there. There's still way too many people trying to convince other people to warm up to the idea that it's okay to be violated and not fight back.
2007-03-28 07:16:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by سيف الله بطل جهاد 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
if they do not get the soldiers back then this is an excellent pretext for invasion and the United States should send in the Stealth Bombers to blind them and then wipe out the country especially the nuclear plants. England should join in with the US - it should be a joint effort.
2007-03-28 00:32:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Iran captured elements of Iraq after Iraq invaded Iran. in spite of the actual undeniable reality that they used mustard gas on Iranian civilians, Iranian troops did not harm Iraqi civilians. it really is qualified by technique of the UN. no longer one warfare crime became committed interior the Iran-Iraq warfare by technique of Iran; you may seem it up . that's just about no longer achieveable to save a warfare completely civil. For all i understand, Raping and then killing little women is antagonistic to Islam. i'm 0.5 Iranian, grew up in Iran. and that i'm efficient Iranians comprehend invading valid, sovereign international places is incorrect. i wish others did.
2016-12-02 22:37:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Let Iran make the next move and judge from there. Remember that Iran is getting more for its oil since they took them. Do you really think that they were oblivious to that?
2007-03-27 23:42:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by liberty11235 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
They should apologize for illegally entering Iran and promise never to do it again.
Britain is like that weak little kid that gives friendship to the bully in exchange for protection. You know the guy..he gets made fun of, pushed around, but tries to be tough by association.
Britain won't do jack$hit and would surely pay if they listened to the bravado from the first 2 "answers".
2007-03-27 23:35:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
England should not do anything stupid like the americans.Many are worried the way US hv offended so many ppl and they will be the first one to be paying a high price for minding other ppl's businesses.No one wants war but IRAN have the upper hand and will not be easily intimidated.best for England to hut the hell up and think for the innocent ppl whom will be affected if they follows the sffotsteps of US
2007-03-27 23:42:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by chasen54 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
i think england should have faith in god
islamb honours jesus as a teacher
many read the bible , they are diplomats ,i feel treat them with respect that respect gets returned
but i feel they also have that american motto
dont tread on me
i sort of put them between the oriental and the africans in way and belief
i see many simularities with the bonzi plane fliers and the decieved suicidal bombers
then again a few atomic bombs isnt going to make them do anything ,i feel its time for grown men to grow up and talk ,
for gods sake send condilisa home [let the brits and iranians handle it]
2007-03-27 23:47:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
section off the country in 3 parts then The US, Britian, and Isreal nuke their area till the bastards glow. Why wait for them to do it to us?
2007-03-27 23:36:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
England should retrain from any offensive.Peace should prevail in the globe.Everything can be solved from dialog
2007-03-27 23:37:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by Altafur R 1
·
0⤊
1⤋