I am Australian, and I've heard about the USA Patriot Act, and how it takes away civil rights and liberties from law abiding Americans, in an attempt to prevent terrorist activity. I've heard that people are being captured and imprisoned without trial, legal representation, or even contact with loved ones, for an indefinite period that may be the rest of the persons natural life. And I've heard that Government officers have unprecedented access to almost anything they need to follow leads in an attempt to identify and obstruct terrorist activity. What I've just heard is that the patriot act is being used to imprison people suspected of being terrorists, under the charge of treason, simply for criticising their country and/or government for enacting and enforcing these laws.
My question is, can anyone confirm or refute any of the above, using ONLY testimony of personal experience of being under these conditions, and/or via a relationship with someone who is/was there?????????????????
2007-03-27
23:03:37
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Bawn Nyntyn Aytetu
5
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics
There is someone I have been talking to about this (you know who you are) and I would like to ask you NOT to answer it, or atleast (if you think you can give a good answer) don't answer straight away. Please wait at least 24 hours before answering (if you really want to) to give other answerers a chance to get their 2 cents in, because you may or may not give an answer, and it may or may not thoroughly annihilate the other answerers, and I don't want any potential answerers discouraged from answering after reading an exceptionally good answer that may or may not come from you.
As a warning to all potential answerers, if your thinking about not answering, I suggest you follow that instinct, because I don't want you getting into any trouble for critisizing someone with a harsh whiplash that you can't avoid, namely your government, Bush, the Republican Party, the public relations team driven by Karl Rove, the Military machine that Donald Rumsfeld drove, or any of the homeland agencies.
2007-03-27
23:18:18 ·
update #1
FRAGINAL-NOYPI AKO - I know about substantiated evidence of criminal activity, but if a government officer working for a 3 letter agency is following a legitimate lead that indicates a person may have had contact with other people suspected of involvement with terrorism, then they can be held for questioning without legal counsel, or being charged with a crime, or being given any information of an expected release date.
Or so I've heard. Is that not true?
I'm not trying to drum up trouble or concerns or hate among people in the US, I'm just interested for personal reasons that relate to ongoing conversations with people in the US.
2007-03-27
23:32:39 ·
update #2
I've given Bryan a thumbs up, because he sounds honest and sincere, and makes me suspect that perhaps I have been misinterpreting some of the information I've received.
To other answerers, if you don't want to confirm or refute what I have said, at least confirm or refute what Bryan has said, please ppl. I'm really searching for answers on this.
2007-03-28
03:49:09 ·
update #3
I want to thank the proud vegan for the link, and have given him a thumbs up for it. Bryan, can you refute or confirm, in you opinion as an officer of the law, if you think the content claimed on that site is true and accurately portrayed, particularly regarding the lisence plate number on the piece of paper, or if you think it's all lies, or somewhere in between. Any comments? I'm not press or anything, and I'm not going to quote you (this is an anonymous forum, so I couldn't even if I wanted to). I only want this for me. contact me privately if you don't want to add details to your answer.
2007-03-28
04:00:23 ·
update #4