occasionally it seems that way, any more it seems like if you don't aggree with homosexuality you are somehow wrong or evil, that if you stand up for a monogomus heterosexual relationship and disagree with flamboyant sexuality of any kind that you are somehow a biggot.
I am not hate mongering, but people are allowed to stand up for their beliefs and disagree with other peoples behaviours on both sides. Have I ever had a gay friend? yes, and he knew how I felt about his choice, and I knew how he felt about mine so we didn't discuss it. I still accepted him as a person... but it often seems that most persons not in heterosexual relationships are so venomous against them that they are guilty of the same biggotry they claim happens to them. For instance I think If I organized a Hetrosexual pride week or parade I'd be crusified and called everything but decent by both gay and strait alike.
2007-03-27 22:33:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by nemsethcszardescu 3
·
7⤊
1⤋
I think there is an agenda to push gay acceptance. All one has to do is look at TV and see how many homosexuals are on there anymore. I could care less what anyone's sexual preference is, and I don't believe anyone 'chooses' to be gay, BUT pushing it in everyone's face all the time, and trying to make people feel they are bigoted if the don't accept it is wrong. I don't want or need to hear about it all the time and that does not make me intolerant or homophobic or any of the other labels that are meant to induce guilt. I don't care if you are gay or straight. SAVE IT FOR THE BEDROOM.
2007-03-28 07:01:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes. Just look at the garbage these Hollywood buttslammers put out on TV and in movies. Just because most of the Hollyweird types are gay they want to push their agenda on everyone else.
2007-03-28 06:27:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
There is an overt agenda to force homosexuality on us as normal.
And there was nothing wrong with this question. Just a lot of people who need to learn some manners.
2007-03-28 07:13:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
It appears that the deviats are on the move first they had the Gay liberation movement, freeing them from normal sexual preferences, then gay marriage, which maybe they have the right to be as miserable as the rest of us, but its imoral and disgusting, now they want to be openly gay in the military and attack a great Marine, Peter Pace, (here I thought they lived for Peter) , now they want to adpot and teach our childrn. Ys it seems being hetrosexual is becoming endangered. Maybe if we sent all the sissys to the middle east, the people they support would educate them
2007-03-28 05:52:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
most definatly, some years ago their was an home secretary
who i believe was confronted with the figures for how many heterasexuals and homosexuals their was, because their were more heteresexuals than homosexuals he decided that he couldnt have this it was not politicaly correct. Now this was a stupid thing to say, unless one can do something about it, which i believe they are, i believe people are being conditioned to become homosexual, they want to get at the kids, they are having nursery books written about gays.
tony blair supports the gays he wanted also to lower the age of consent to 14. their is a school of thought that sexual preference should go all the way without restriction, just like ancient egypt, this will ruin the country totaly.
2007-03-28 05:38:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by trucker 5
·
2⤊
4⤋
Well it is an interesting idea.
For centuries people who are not attracted to the opposite sex have been forced into marriages they can't be true to.
Promoting homesexual lifestyle choice can undermine marriage, alone with the pill, feminism and many other factors.
In reality gay people just want to be gay. That is all.
2007-03-28 05:36:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by flingebunt 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
There's nothing hidden about it!
EDIT:-
WOOHOO! I've got 3 "thumbs down" in half an hour!
I bet they are are from heteros who think that I'm homophobic. That couldn't be further from the truth, I love gay people, they're usually a lot of fun to be around. what I object to is the political/media agenda to promote homosexuality. You are what you are and shouldn't be swayed in any direction by anyone other than yourself.
As you've probably gathered I have nothing against gay folk, my gripe is with the left wing (usually straight) trendies who try to ram homosexuality down everyone else's throat. If you ask me, they are just as bigoted as the homophobes.
2007-03-28 05:30:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
4⤋
Sorry I misread the question the first time. Yes, I agree.
2007-03-28 06:55:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by Truth B. Told ITS THE ECONOMY STUPID 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Promoting rights for one group does nothing to undermine the rights of another group.
2007-03-28 07:03:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋