Is this why we have not helped our British friends recover their troops held in Tehran?
2007-03-27 20:03:10 · 9 answers · asked by Blessed 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Actually I thought Israel did pretty good in Lebanon. The only problem was they started listening to the media. They should have destroyed everything within 50 miles of the border.
2007-03-27 22:11:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Israel's attack on lebanon wasn't a "tragedy of errors." That entire (radical) islamic culture is in a very confused and irrational state. If we get the proper backing, then it will be the proper thing to do. You'll probably back out of taking any action because you value your own life many times more than the lives of our children and their future children.
If we don't have to wage war with Iran, it will be better for us all. But if worse comes to worse and the threat appears to be becoming greater, we have to take action now so that we don't allow Iran to grow strong enough that if and when our children's children engage them in the future, Iran hasn't become so leathally advanced that they shed 10x the amount of blood as we would today.
just my humble opinion.
2007-03-28 03:13:00 · answer #2 · answered by World Expert 1 · 1⤊ 2⤋
How was the assault on Hezbollah by Israel a "tragedy of errors". They struck back, as any country would, if attacked. The useless U.N., supposedly brokered another shaky ceasefire, and sent in an absolutely useless "peacekeeping" force.
The British troops captured by Iran need to be dealt with by England. Why should we intervene at this point?
2007-03-28 03:07:09 · answer #3 · answered by C J 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
The UK doesn't need any help in recovering their 15 sailors who were kidnapped by the Iranians. I believe the Iranians are looking for a way to back out of the mess they got themselves into. Their relations with most nations in the world, including Russia, suffered a serious setback because of this act of piracy. On top of a vote on UN sanctions for the nuclear program, it hasn't been a good period for the Ahmadinejad facist government.
2007-03-28 03:11:40 · answer #4 · answered by gone 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
As far as I can tell this looks a lot like incident that occurred back in the 80's when US soldiers where held hostage in Tehran. They (military) attempted a rescue that failed do to technical issues. This looks like a larger pissing contest thought, with Iraq and Afghanistan in the balance as well. I wouldn't be surprised if a skirmish or two arises.
2007-03-28 03:42:45 · answer #5 · answered by fooding 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Not really what ya mean by tragedy of errors, Isreal pretty much put a beating on lebanon LOL
2007-03-28 03:05:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Iran is pretty ready.maybe it will be disaster.NO WAR.one my friend like this song'it tragedy'.
2007-03-28 03:08:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Ummm..Cuz we are over extended on two fronts. Do you know what happened to Germany and Rome?
2007-03-28 03:07:54 · answer #8 · answered by nicewknd 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
WW3
2007-03-28 03:35:24 · answer #9 · answered by Surfer Dude 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋