English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The 911 commission report was a total slap in the face to all the victims, God bless their souls. The time is long overdue for a real investigation. Agreed?

2007-03-27 19:25:54 · 22 answers · asked by Surfer Dude 2 in Politics & Government Politics

22 answers

Hellz yeah they should reopen it! These sheep/lemming idiots only know what Fox and CNN tell them.

2007-03-27 19:33:59 · answer #1 · answered by moonshinemary 2 · 3 5

The 9-11 Commission was formed to conduct the "real investigation". How was it that their work was a total slap in the face? Originally Bush was against the formation of the Commission, but he finally caved in to political wisdom and common sense. The bipartisan Commission did an outstanding job. Did you read the report?

2007-03-28 02:54:33 · answer #2 · answered by gone 6 · 4 2

I'm sorry,I fail to see how the report would be a slap in the face to the families and the victims.

I've said it before and I will say it again:
Do NOT use the victims of 9/11 as a tool in your moronic conspiracy theories.THAT is the slap in the face,and a toTal insult to all of those who died that day.

2007-03-28 03:13:56 · answer #3 · answered by Serena 5 · 3 3

It was a full bi-partisan report! You need a slap in the face for asking a question w/o knowing any facts beforehand!

2007-03-28 08:18:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Obviously not, from those that spew hatred against the people that lost loved ones that day. Don't mind the haters that attack your question. They were traumatized and brainwashed by FOX News.

This is not a Democrat or Republican issue. I didn't originaly believed that 9/11 was a psyop, a total scam, but I never believed some fake tv bs about Osama and some fake confessions.

2007-03-28 02:40:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

Not agreed. Those folks have been through enough. Why do they have to keep reliving that horror? Because a bunch of conspiracy theorists want to get their paranoid delusional "fix"?

We know who killed those folks. The focus should be on killing off those responsible for the attacks, not endless and needless "investigations". The families want justice for their losses, not a bunch of politicians re-hashing and reopening old wounds.

2007-03-28 02:35:03 · answer #6 · answered by C J 6 · 5 3

Yeah, let's place you in charge and round up the Miller-Lite Man Law committee to formalize the report.

Dude, surf's up! Hey at least with Global Warming, you'll get some killer waves.

Stellar man!!

2007-03-28 02:48:53 · answer #7 · answered by SirCharles 6 · 2 3

I'm all for it, lets start the interviews with the dead pilots, then move on to the dead terrorists in the planes, and finish up with the dead passangers on the planes to get an accurate account of what happened. otherwise it is all guess work and a bunch of overpaid pencil pushers on macs guessing at what it would look like when it went down.

2007-03-28 02:32:05 · answer #8 · answered by nyxcat1999 3 · 4 4

Yes, obviously there is alot amiss, and alot of people need to be brought to justice who haven't already. The truth needs to be brought out to honour the dead, the farce which is going on right now is an utter slap in the face to them.

Hear that- those of you who do not try to help the truth to get out are insulting all these victims! I'm not using them for my benifit, I'm so sad it happened, but everybody is being so f'ing ignorant about this it's just crazy.

2007-03-28 02:37:28 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 6

You know that the 35 year old virgin in his mother's basement who first blogged about this stupid conspiracy theory is laughing his *** off right now about all the people taking him seriously.

2007-03-28 02:37:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4 3

Conspiracy nuts don't care about the victim's or their families. They're only interested in furthering their anti-Bush movement.

2007-03-28 02:33:01 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 6 3

fedest.com, questions and answers