Is it because MIT, NIST, FEMA and anyone else for that matter possibly explain the sudden implosion of WTC 7 as reported by the BBC twenty minutes before it fell. C'mon, it doesn't take a MIT professor to smell a rat.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9CXQY-bZn4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7SwOT29gbc#nRG4b1coRVk
2007-03-27
18:30:59
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
No answers, only insults. I've got a used in foil hat just f you my friend.
2007-03-27
18:42:14 ·
update #1
I will continue to ask the questions if I feel like it. At this point, I've not gotten an answer why the NIST and FEMA have refused to xplain the collapse of WTC 7.
Do you work for the NIST? Do you work for FEMA? Do you work for MIT? Do you work for Popular Mechanics? No? Then STFU!!!
You're lucky I'm out of questions today!!!
2007-03-27
18:51:17 ·
update #2
Hey, the only facts in this story is that the govenment officials will not and cannot explain WTC 7! Even the the theories on WTC 1 and 2 by all accounts speculative. The MIT report is full of perhaps and maybes.
Since airplane attacts have never happened and all the evidence was disposed of, I guess we'll never know the truth about WTC 1, 2 or the Pentagon (no video of plane).
2007-03-27
19:04:55 ·
update #3
Chase, you said it perfectly: opinions not facts!!! You have no facts.
2007-03-27
19:06:54 ·
update #4