English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

C'mon, personal attacks cannot debate the fact that no one, not even the NIST, FEMA, or ANYONE for that matter, explain the collapse of WTC 7. Plus you probably have skid marks and a stinky bum.

2007-03-27 18:16:43 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

8 answers

No, you just do not want to listen to what other people know as fact. Doing so would be admitting that you were wrong, but you deny simple things that many people have figured out without having to read about. NIST, FEMA, and Popular Mechanics merely explain how it happened, but like I said before, you just cannot except simple truth. Look who is attacking who here.

2007-03-27 18:34:57 · answer #1 · answered by Chase 5 · 1 1

No, it's because you are choosing to ignore actual facts and replace them with supposition.

You still can't answer realistically about flights 77 or 93, other than to put forth another, even more ridiculous theory.

Every actually been to New York? If not, you wouldn't understand just how close WTC7 was to the twin towers. It's no wonder to me, at all, that WTC7 collapsed.

I stay at the Millenium hotel back in 1998. And I know exactly what the area used to look like and how close the buildings were to each other. Try a trip to NYC sometime, and you'll get it.

I really could care less about your personal grooming.

2007-03-28 01:48:13 · answer #2 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 1 0

There are plenty of facts out there that explain what happened but you wouldn't want to start contaminating your brain with truth at this stage would you? Isn't it much easier to just stay on the side of the anti-Semitics or the new world order bunch. Every time one of your "facts" is proven false all you have to do is just dismiss it without bothering to think about it.

The biggest hole in all the conspiracy theories is that too many people would have to be in on it. And all it would take is one person to crack and give irrefutable evidence to a credible source to break it wide open.

2007-03-28 01:26:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

You asked a question about conspiracy and those that don't believe it are brainwashed. I simply brought up what I considered to be a revelant point about how susceptible one might be to anything like that by past behavior.Then you call names. Exactually what your questions before were about only about yourself.

2007-03-28 01:24:37 · answer #4 · answered by ohbrother 7 · 1 0

WTC7
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_World_Trade_Center
http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/

2007-03-28 01:39:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Bottom line is WTC was brought down by controlled demolition, anyone who says otherwise simply has not dine enough research.

2007-03-28 01:49:58 · answer #6 · answered by Luke F 3 · 0 3

911 was an inside job...keep asking these questions and I will do the same.

2007-03-28 02:59:16 · answer #7 · answered by Surfer Dude 2 · 0 2

Does the M stand for moron?

2007-03-28 01:27:18 · answer #8 · answered by Homeless in Phoenix 6 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers