The communists have taken over the democrat party. Go to this link and read the platform of the communists:
http://www.cpusa.org/article/archive/9/
http://www.cpusa.org/article/frontpage/1
2007-03-27
17:49:12
·
19 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
You don't know the first thing about fascism. If you can take the time to read their website, they have nothing to do with the republicans or conservatives:
http://www.americanfascistparty.com/index2.html
2007-03-27
17:57:06 ·
update #1
The kennedys had nazi sympathizers as well. Ever heard of joe kennedy?
2007-03-27
18:00:03 ·
update #2
I love how all you liberals/communists will not admit that you support the communist platform. All you keep talking about is bush and this question has nothing to do with bush.
2007-03-27
18:07:27 ·
update #3
HECK YAH!!!
You Rock!!!
2007-03-27 18:02:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by Rachel 2
·
3⤊
5⤋
i am afraid this is a well made propaganda of many of the right wing conservatives. Democrats are as much as Communists as Republicans are Fascist. Yes Democrats are definetly closer to communism then republicans are but they are far far off. communism is where the gov controls EVERYTHING. the Dems before clinton wanted to give more aid to the poor but not completely take over the economic system. After clinton became pres, the dems are even less so that now the poor have to work to get most of this aid thus motivating them to move up the ecenomic ladder. In communism there is no ladder, just one floor in which everyone is completely economically equal in every aspect.
oh and by the way, communism is an economic system, it really isn't even supposed to be a party or government
2007-03-27 17:57:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by me, myself and I 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
I wouldn't talk about Communism when bush is acting like one. Isn't a Democracy listening to the people? What is bush doing? He doesn't listen to anyone. Look at the Iraqi debacle going on. People in this country want out. He doesn't listen. There was a non-partisan review on the war and what was needed. What does he do? He wipes his backside with it and wants to add more troops.
You say Communists are taking over the Democratic party. Bush is trying to make this country a Dictatorship...
2007-03-27 18:05:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by linus_van_pelt_4968 5
·
3⤊
2⤋
I think your refering to the system of government where it is military rule. Democrats seems more people rule with a big interest in feeding other countries that requires an annual fee to join. The further one looks the less one knows though is how I feel about this like its all an intelligence rewind. Don't worry.
2007-03-27 17:59:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Individual freedom is the dream of our age. It's what our leaders promise to give us, it defines how we think of ourselves and, repeatedly, we have gone to war to impose freedom around the world. But if you step back and look at what freedom actually means for us today, it's a strange and limited kind of freedom.
Politicians promised to liberate us from the old dead hand of bureaucracy, but they have created an evermore controlling system of social management, driven by targets and numbers. Governments committed to freedom of choice have presided over a rise in inequality and a dramatic collapse in social mobility. And abroad, in Iraq and Afghanistan, the attempt to enforce freedom has led to bloody mayhem and the rise of an authoritarian anti-democratic Islamism. This, in turn, has helped inspire terrorist attacks in Britain. In response, the Government has dismantled long-standing laws designed to protect our freedom.
The origins of our contemporary, narrow idea of freedom.
shows how a simplistic model of human beings as self-seeking, almost robotic, creatures led to today's idea of freedom. This model was derived from ideas and techniques developed by nuclear strategists during the Cold War to control the behaviour of the Soviet enemy.
Mathematicians such as John Nash developed paranoid game theories whose equations required people to be seen as selfish and isolated creatures, constantly monitoring each other suspiciously – always intent on their own advantage.
This model was then developed by genetic biologists, anthropologists, radical psychiatrists and free market economists, and has come to dominate both political thinking since the Seventies and the way people think about themselves as human beings.
However, within this simplistic idea lay the seeds of new forms of control. And what people have forgotten is that there are other ideas of freedom. We are, in a trap of our own making that controls us, deprives us of meaning and causes death and chaos abroad.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctwo/noise/?id=trap
2007-03-27 23:13:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
And the Boogie man........I'm sooo scared...
Our government has kept us in a perpetual state of fear - kept us in a continuous stampede of patriotic fervor - with the cry of grave national emergency. Always there has been some terrible evil at home or some monstrous foreign power that was going to gobble us up if we did not blindly rally behind it
Douglas MacArthur
2007-03-27 17:59:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
Pretty much, yes. The difference between them is, is that the Democrats think they are helping people survive, and the Communists know they are not. Which one would you say is more stupid?
2007-03-27 18:01:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by xenypoo 7
·
2⤊
4⤋
No they are not the same.
And here's a heads up--quite seriously. Neither you nor the yuks on those links even knows the definition of communism. Consequently, you really look like a fool to anyone who does know! :)
2007-03-27 17:59:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
Is the definition of insanity asking the same question again and again and expecting a different answer?
2007-03-27 17:58:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by Longhaired Freaky Person 4
·
1⤊
3⤋
um even if they have,..which is laughable...those platforms arnt exactly bad..
Full economic, social and political equality for African American people with affirmative action with goals and timetables.
Free, quality public education under full community control emphasizing the rights of students, teachers and staff with curricula that reflect the history and aspirations of the community.
The rights and the fights that concern young people; including free, quality public education.
how can you argue AGAINST there platforms???
2007-03-27 17:58:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
5⤋
Some people still living in the Cold War.
THE RUSSIANS ARE COMING!
2007-03-27 17:56:14
·
answer #11
·
answered by Lost. at. Sea. 7
·
3⤊
3⤋