Seems like he can manipulate the Whole Nation to support his cause by using key words aka Jingoism.
I seemed to follow his speeches carefully and noticed that he uses "freedom", "democracy" "Al Qaueda", "Islamic Fundamentalist" "Saddam Hussein" "Iran", "Middle East", "terrorists" "soveirn nation of Iraq" "free elections in Iraq" and his KEY TERM that always uses to end his speechs *"I have talked to familes of soldiers of those who have lost their lives"* I noticed that he uses these terms every few seconds. Seems like that when he is finished with his speeches, he has whole America feeling like they must go enlist in the military right now and join the fight and fight for their country immediately.
2007-03-27 17:48:09 · 28 answers · asked by PROUD TO BE A LIBERAL TEEN! 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No, Bush himself is not a master of anything besides the gin bottle. He does have Karl Rove and Dead Eye Dick to steer him as to what to say when. I am sure that he has a team of spin doctors in the back ground that do a good job of changing the meaning of words. Bush is to dumb to tie his own shoes and without these people he would be living under a bridge and cooking over an open fire. .
2007-03-28 01:11:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
He's been trying his best with Karl and Dick helping but the world and history are not helping.
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”
Joseph Goebbels
2007-03-27 18:04:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
there have been terrorists in Iraq way, way till now any Bush hit the scene. The Iraqi government decrease than Saddam's rule had a historical past of helping countless and varied terrorist communities going back to the 70s. I recommend you start up actually interpreting terrorism and its historical past till now you're making any further vapid posts like this one.
2016-12-19 15:32:52 · answer #3 · answered by zissler 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
GW is a master propagandist about as much as a drive through speaker clown knows what's in the happy meal. he has master propagandists writing his speeches and acting coaches telling him at what point in the speech to raise a sincere eyebrow, smirk condescendingly or produce an "I mean business" scowl. he says what he's told to say by his handlers.
2007-03-27 18:03:28 · answer #4 · answered by nebtet 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Affirmative
2007-03-27 17:54:02 · answer #5 · answered by Surfer Dude 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, but he has a lot of speech writers who are (or were before the nation became disillusioned). The president is just a talking head.
2007-03-27 17:50:31 · answer #6 · answered by sunnydaydreame 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
HAHA, if you obviously haven't been paying attention to the media lately. I like Bush but he is seriously dropping the ball on the socalled "propaganda." Those terms that he uses emphasize his points. Its not like hes calling the terrorists something like "hell spawn" or "satan's children." They are people who commit acts of terror, therefore terrorists. On the other hand we have the media who if I may use a recent example are running a propaganda smear campaign against Bush like in the 8 attorneys case. They are falsley portraying the issue as illegal, I know there is dispute over the ethics of it and that is yet to be determined but this is completely legal. It is the MEDIA which is the MASTER of PROPAGANDA
2007-03-27 18:01:21 · answer #7 · answered by Hobo Bob 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
No. I do not think that President Bush is any worse than any other politician we have had in that office. At least he took a stand to what happened to our Country and I applaud him for that. Remember it was President Johnson that kept the Viet Nam war going just so he could be the person to say that he had won the war - this was stated on the Biography series several years back. Thanks for letting me have my say.
2007-03-27 18:10:26 · answer #8 · answered by Cindy W 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
According to your name you are joining the air force in 2 years? And what if the Iraq war is still happening, will you still go? What if it's Iran or some other war? I mean you do realize if you join in two years what can actually happen so we don't hear you in two years whining about the injustice of the President and of his war whoever or wherever it may be.
2007-03-27 18:06:02 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
All Politicians are master at propgabnda to a certain degree. That's the nature of the profession.
2007-03-27 17:50:32 · answer #10 · answered by anthonyjthan 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋